Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

“Your wife has always had the right to invite cops into your house. If you cannot trust her, why did you marry her?”

Well, I didn’t marry her, so there’s your answer to that one. However, from the way the article reads, it seems like the police couldn’t search the home if one present occupant objected, but now they can, if they arrest that occupant and get him out of the way.

The obvious consequence of this ruling that I foresee is that police will use this new power during domestic disputes. As soon as they get the man in cuffs, they won’t need any stinking probable cause to go on a fishing expedition against him.

“The 4th Amendment does not prohibit all warrantless searches.”

No, but it puts some limits on what warrantless searches are allowed, and this is another little chip knocked off those limits.


35 posted on 02/25/2014 5:33:50 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
Well, I didn’t marry her, so there’s your answer to that one. However, from the way the article reads, it seems like the police couldn’t search the home if one present occupant objected, but now they can, if they arrest that occupant and get him out of the way.

Once an arrest is made they can search anyway. That's not new.

44 posted on 02/25/2014 5:41:42 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson