Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Altariel

“...may not object to a search when he is not at home.”

I didn’t read the article, but I hope this means that the occupant consents IS home that they can perform a search. (Still not right imho.)

I hope it doesn’t mean “Ok Frank, the guy just left for work - break down the door.”


5 posted on 02/25/2014 5:04:19 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve

“We therefore hold that an occupant who is absent due to a lawful detention or arrest stands in the same shoes as an occupant who is absent for any other reason,” Alito said.


8 posted on 02/25/2014 5:07:07 PM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: 21twelve
"I didn’t read the article, but I hope this means that the occupant consents IS home that they can perform a search. (Still not right imho.)"

I think you are right. They can't search a home without a warrant just because a person isn't home. But if one occupant consents, and nobody is there to object, then they can search. Be careful who you live with.

34 posted on 02/25/2014 5:31:25 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson