Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 3Fingas

I agree Paul Ryan had an issue, and agree he needs to be looked at critically, I just wanted to say he sounded good on CNBC.

He looks good, and seems very much on the ball.

Don’t count him out. He seems to be thinking on his feet.

For example one of the CNBC anchors set him up, trying very hard to get him to come down on the side against Jan Brewer.

He was very good, and wouldn’t.

Just saying. I’m not advocating strongly for Ryan, but I just think we should keep him in the “active consideration” status is all.

I think he’s good on balance.


6 posted on 02/26/2014 6:04:46 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ( http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Cringing Negativism Network

That’s all well and good. We need candidates that can express themselves clearly and sound informed when doing so. I don’t dispute that Ryan can sound that way often. However, I am disgusted with rino appeasers of illegal aliens. I am also not convinced that Ryan is that strong of a candidate either. Remember his debate performance with the clown Joe Biden? Biden’s immature antics went unanswered by Ryan suggesting Ryan can’t hang in any future debate. We don’t need candidates that can’t slug it out in the school yard either.


7 posted on 02/26/2014 6:21:20 AM PST by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters for Freedom and Rededication to the Principles of the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network; All

I understand yours and others viewpoints.

IMHO, the major point of contention between us is the differing level of tolerance each of has for silently allowing elected Republicans to act as submissive doormats for violators of the US Constitution.

IOW, what level of tolerance does each of us have, when exceeded, will put the elected Republicans who do nothing to oppose violations of the US Constitution in the category of “Do Nothing RINOs?”

If you don’t like your Do Nothing RINO, then insist that he/she resign, PERIOD.

My level of “Do Nothing RINOs,” (DNR), tolerance was forever exceeded during the Primary Campaign of 2012.

I will not anymore vote for Do Nothing RINOs again.

I shall just leave their slots blank on the ballot, as there is no effective difference between a Do Nothing RINO and a Democrat.

At each time, during the past five years of critical voting, the Do Nothing RINOs in the House and Senate have voted with the Democrats to approve the violation of the US Constitution being voted on.

Their usual defeatist whine is: “We can’t do anything because we do not have control of the Senate or White House.”

The Do Nothing RINOs were given FIVE years to do something and did nothing.

Now it is our turn.

IOW, the Do Nothing RINOs and the Democrats vote together as a single, unshakable, voting block to rubber-stamp whatever Obama wants to do to “Fundamentally Change the United States of America.”


9 posted on 02/26/2014 6:58:50 AM PST by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson