I guess you didn’t read the article, and decided to comment on it anyway.
The article calls into serious question the credibility of MM.
With no MM credibility, all your hatred towards Joe Paterno goes for naught.
Of course, Frank Fina (the chief js prosecutor) already TOLD YOU that Joe Paterno was not involved in any coverup, but you chose not to listen to that either.
The ones who have their heads in the sand here aren’t people like me - who see an injustice and want it corrected, but rather people like YOU - who desperately cling to the existing false media narrative that you so want to believe.
Then answer at long last what connection you have with Penn State, Paterno, etc. You have been asked this numerous times and not just by me.
Personally, I have no “hate” for Paterno. I think he was a pathetic old man who stayed too long and let himself be insulated by the cult of personality. Like it or not, he will be remembered for this as will the rest of the sorry bunch that allowed this to continue for some years.
...I wish I’d seen this thread earlier, so I could post when it meant something, but if anybody’s still out there, well...
The article calls into serious question the credibility of MM.
...no it doesn’t; i don’t know what you were reading, but this article simply recapitulates what Jerry’s lawyers tried to slime MM with (BTW, Romminger just relinquished his law license here in Pa...good choice of lawyer, Jerry)and that some people, mostly PSU apologists, bought it hook line and sinker...it is hardly breaking news, you could have posted this two years ago and nothing would have changed...the main point seems to be how MM’s life has been ruined by this, and that it’s still not over for him...but again, good spin job at making it say what you want to say, which seems to be a special skill of yours...
With no MM credibility, all your hatred towards Joe Paterno goes for naught.
...as you well know, MM is not without credibility, or no grand jury indictment would have been returned against Sandusky, now would it...? I mean, seeing that the basis of the indictment was MM credibility, and lack of same for Curley and Schultz, your statement is ultra delusional, IOW, par for the course...and there would have been no grand jury for MM to be found credible at if it were not for Victim #1, a teenager who was twice ground into chutney by the Pa’s compassionate legal system before finally getting his day in court, and guess what? he didn’t even know MM, or really anybody at PSU; his testimony was simply his own personal experience...so to clear this matter up a little, the grand jury would have happened, even if MM had never said word one to anybody, MM just helped the indictment happen...so, you actually do your quixotic little cause a great disservice by pretending that MM is critical in this matter, because he is not...
...oh, and about your identity...are you really Dottie Sandusky...? Your attacks on the victims make me suspect you are...