Posted on 03/05/2014 8:17:32 AM PST by servo1969
not necessarily... my parents raised seven children... of the seven, there was one rebellious child... they did not raise her to be that way... but she chose to be that way... they had a hard time with her for 2-3 years during her teen years... drinking, cutting school, getting into fights... being brought home in a police car... my parents never covered for her... they let her experience the consequences... which is what i think these parents were doing--letting their daughter experience the consequences of moving out on her own... until this law suit!
fortunately, by the time my sister finished high school, she straightened out... she went to college, got married, raised her son who went to private school, college, and is now a State Trooper... my sister and her husband have been married since 1975... they are both productive members of society...
my niece, who is my age, had a similar experience with her daughter... her teen-aged daughter met an older guy, wanted to be with him all the time, got into big fights with her parents over it... she moved out... my niece was heart-broken... it was awful! (she never experienced any of this with her other three children)... but eventually her daughter realized the guy was no good as her parents had warned... came back... things worked out... that was several years ago... even if things seem broken now, it does not mean there is no hope... that there is nothing to salvage...
mis dos centavos...
All they'd have to do is call it a tax and the USSC would happily uphold it as Constitutional.
That could be.
+1
Just found this Blog - call me cynical but I sense this is really a battle of the dads
Thanks —
Very interesting
...in a related story, Miss Canning is also suing her parents to pay for her new sports car, as well as her home entertainment center, breast implants, and nose job.
Christie handed out those monitoring contracts to his lawyer friends $52 million to have some paralegals observe the school and write some reports to make sure there was no more corruption. Isn't that ironic, that there is no over- sight over the US Attorney's office from handing out these contracts or the over-charging lawyers.
Now that he's a fat cat living off our tax money - him and his wife are taking limo rides into New York City and plying teens with wine coolers.
Inglesino is no stranger to the shady side of New Jersey politics. Four years ago, he was accused of pension-padding through a part-time job as a political consultant for an elected official to whom Inglesino made political contributions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.