To: taildragger
If a daughter under 26 gets pregnant...lives away from parents (maybe with boyfriend)...do parents still have to list her on their insurance
19 posted on
03/09/2014 9:24:43 AM PDT by
goodnesswins
(R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
To: goodnesswins
Boy you got me, but given the sit on your @$$ and light up a Camel mentality of Pelosi / Obama and it is gonna be great, do what you want as an artist you are free, anything is possible. The Fubaring of the greatest healthcare system and governmental system known to man in history continues...
21 posted on
03/09/2014 9:29:19 AM PDT by
taildragger
(The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
To: goodnesswins
I have no idea where they came up with 26 but when I was 26 years old, I had already been out on my own for 8 years, had purchased my first house and was starting a family. The notion that my parents would still need to support me at that age just seems so bizarre. I left their nest just a few months out of high school and never looked back.
I was thinking the same thing about this young woman. So she can go get herself knocked up and her parents still must provide her, and by extension, her illegitimate child with health care? The world has gone totally nuts.
To: goodnesswins
This is BD.
At 26 my kids were graduated from college and owned their own homes.
31 posted on
03/09/2014 9:46:23 AM PDT by
svcw
(Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
To: goodnesswins
My understanding is the daughter is still covered, although the delivery of the child would be a non covered service.
Bottom line because of the coverage until age 26 rule in the ACA, 26 will be interpreted to be the new age of emancipation from parents. Divorce lawyers will have a field day.
38 posted on
03/09/2014 10:04:12 AM PDT by
buckalfa
(Tilting at Windmills)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson