Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hard to say at this point whether they were negligent in not closing the road he was on or not, or whether they should have been quicker in recognizing that there was someone alive in the car. I’m not saying he’s correct, but given the statute of limitations for these types of claims (depending on the state) I think all his lawyers are doing at this point is establishing the right to sue, if it comes to that. I think it was smart for them to do this, and I don’t blame this guy for keeping this option open. In the end, maybe all he wants is some leverage such that they will help him deal with the medical bills.

For the record, I share the views of most here that there are way too many lawsuits, and especially way too many frivolous ones. That said, sometimes you need a lawyer, and sometimes suing someone is the right thing to do.


12 posted on 03/11/2014 7:47:34 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: pieceofthepuzzle
What are his actual losses? It does not sound like he has any permanent injury so if they were negligent maybe they would be liable for medical bills and loss of property.

Of course he is unlikely to win because of sovereign immunity. The police and fire departments have no obligation to protect.

14 posted on 03/11/2014 7:51:02 AM PDT by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson