Thanks oldeconomybuyer!
Another pingout to all y’all!
A mystery is hopefully closer to being solved!
Think the’r area is WAY too small. They are assuming the range was limited to how far Beijing was. The range actually would extend over to Somalia and into Iraq/Iran...
Gotta love Islamic nations with western civilizations hi tech security devices to protect them against Christian “terrorists” aka ministers. Their sole focus is Christians and jews, not even bothering to look at their fellow muslims.
This is just one of those examples.
We need to stop giving them technologies and allowing them to leave their islam induced turd world countries! Leave them them and let them steep in their own crap!
Its too bad more muslims do not recognize the failings in Islam.
Posts as:
Right click on the image at the source and select "copy image location" or its equivalent in your browser.
Maybe it landed in China, as scheduled.
It would be nice if they gave their parameters for the runways on the list. Planes can land on runways a lot shorter than the specifications call for, if safety margins aren’t a consideration. Same thing with range - are they talking about maximum cruising range, or to the last drop range?
Except that if the plane had landed successfully, ACARS would have sent a message to Rolls Royce saying that the engines had been powered off. The SATCOM system was never disabled, nor was ACARS. Rolls Royce only expected three messages during this flight and they received two of them: takeoff thrust and initial cruise climb completed.
I think I have a possible target after refitting the a/c...the Petronias Towers, very large will do a lot of damage when hit esp. if a/c is full of explosives or small nuke or other WMD’s. The a/c would not need a full fuel load to reach them, but the mix of jet fuel to air would make a large explosion/burn upon impact. The towers do a lot of business with the “Western World” , making it one big fat target.
Check Craig’s list for a used 777 aircraft for sale.
People! A little sanity please!
Applying Occam’s Razor, the most simple explanation is that it was aliens, therefore this is the most likely explanation.
These unlikely conspiracies blaming mechanical failures and terrorism are truly signs of ignorant and scared people.
This forum could use a little more rationality.
Thank you.
where ever it landed, the mission was a complete success.
Why did it take a week to publicly mention those pings?
Needed time to find some way to cover up what happened?
My comment: Golly gee. We searched everywhere around China and it wasn't there. We will never know what happened. So move on.
(The www.wnd.com is NOT saying that Red China shot it down but given their "rules" for aircraft in the area.. they could have shot it down. The killings of 60 million-plus Chinese citizens by the Communist Party of China were contemporaneous events for me.. so I imagine the PRC shrugs. "What's another three hundred or so?". But they and their cheap-labor-lovin', free-tradin' useful idiots still want it covered up.)
Thanks for the map link
How many of these runways are 7000 feet long & concrete ?
Of course of that set, a large number would/could be assumed to call up and say “Hey we got a spare 777 that just landed” regardless of whether whoever was in charge of the craft let anyone on board say anything to anyone.
And any nation in charge of a runway that didn’t do that when it landed would “have some splainin to do”.
How many of the 634 are owned by George Soros?
my armchair theory is china wanted the power ic chip makers on that plane. they just introd a whole new line of military power ic chips the beginning of march.