I think it's best summed up by Ken White over at Popehat, though. He's the free speech expert, and he lays it out well:
That post is a month old, and like yours, is mistaken: http://www.steynonline.com/6201/what-kind-of-fool-am-i
Problem is, all of his data AND his methodology has been publicly available for years
This claim is also completely false. Go over to http://climateaudit.org/and read the complete history of the Warmists' conspiracy to deny rightful FOIA [and the UK counterpart laws] over many years, to many different petitioners.
He does not. He's gone total pro se. And Steyn is refusing any and all offers of assistance so far.
Untrue. It wasn't true when Popehat first claimed and posted it 5 weeks ago, and it obviously isn't true now.
So either those other climatologists are in on a big conspiracy, or his work is up to snuff.
They are involved in a conspiracy, which is what the East Anglia email scandals were all about. You need to disabuse yourself of your silly ideas; in particular, have fun reading Steve McIntyre's blog, where he meticulously establishes what the emails say, and in which he completely demolishes Mann's laughable claim that he has been exonerated of scientific wrongdoing by eleven different independent commissions. No. He hasn't. Only the PSU whitewash even mentions "Nobel Prize Winner" Michael Mann. You should also check out Bishop Hill. His timeline and details about the Warmist Cadre's attempt to suffocate debate and violate the law is illuminating as well.
This isn't Daily Kos, DU, or some other dump website where you're used to posting, where you can just post crap. Keep up to date with the facts, or don't post at all.
And Welcome to FreeRepublic, N00b.
Was there anything the N00b posted that was accurate? Anything?