Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

In a haughty tone: "What's the point in discussing ANYTHING with these ignorant skeptic fools? There is absolutely no logic or reasoning in their so called protests/arguments. It's an utter waste of time to engage in any dialogue with them.".

Sounds putry familiar to just about any subject the radical leftwing extremist dimokkkrat scumbags refuse to "debate" with reasonable, logical persons. "They" know best and will let you know what your opinion is if and when they ask for it.

1 posted on 03/24/2014 6:40:57 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

Right out of Atlas Shrugged. “Well, if you don’t already KNOW, I just can’t explain it to you”.


2 posted on 03/24/2014 6:43:04 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Y’see, the debate would be massive, and the warmists don’t want the public to know what excellent mass debaters they are.


3 posted on 03/24/2014 6:45:23 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Leftists never want to debate the merits or the truth of their “issues”,

they simply seek to ELIMINATE their opposition.

They aren’t interested in the truth so much as they are in advancing an agenda.


4 posted on 03/24/2014 6:46:19 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

And those of us who are actually proficient in math and physics know why.


5 posted on 03/24/2014 6:48:53 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Of course they don’t want public debates. Showing them pictures of the artic all froze up goes against their profuse statements that the artic ice would be all gone by last summer.


6 posted on 03/24/2014 6:54:33 AM PDT by CodeToad (Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

More and more, I hope the skeptics start compiling criminal cases of science fraud against the hucksters. Not just to punish them, but to prevent such schemes in the future.

In the 1970s, the science fraud, butterfly expert, Paul R. Ehrlich and his wife wrote a hysterical Malthusian screed called “The Population Bomb”, screaming that human reproduction in the entire world must be brought under tight government control, and that all natural resources are in shortage and must be rationed by the government.

And when his predictions of global collapse in the 1980s failed utterly, *no one* called him on it. He did not spend a day in prison for his public panic, and millions of dollars spent by governments to address his demands. And importantly, even today, he is still honored and respected by *the same people* who advance the man made global warming hysteria.

Had Ehrlich and his cronies wore prison pajamas for at least 10 years each, much of the MMGW nonsense would be far more muted.

And my point is that, unless the MMGW crowd are *punished* for wasting *billions* of dollars to establish their one-world dictatorial totalitarian regime, they won’t stop.

In 20 years or so, they will be back with yet another scam, and a factor again larger than MMGW, which itself was a factor larger than the population crisis b.s.

They must be stopped. And the only way to stop them is to make them pay for their crimes against society, the taxpayers, and freedom and liberty.

These scoundrels need prison time, and it is up to the skeptics to insure they get it. They should at a minimum be stripped of their academic credentials, what they wrote should be disavowed and pulled from publication, and they should have to pay back the vast sums of government money they were given under false pretenses.

And then they need to spend time in prison to contemplate the error of their ways.


7 posted on 03/24/2014 6:56:04 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

If any of their computer-generated, worst case scenario models were starting to pan out these people would be more than happy to debate AGW skeptics.


10 posted on 03/24/2014 8:01:45 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
 photo LanguageGREENMotivesRED2_zpsa053de7e.jpg
13 posted on 03/24/2014 9:09:00 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Dan Weiss is not a scientist.

According to the Center for American Progress website, he is a "graduate of the University of Michigan with both a Bachelor of Arts and Master of Public Policy degrees."

17 posted on 03/24/2014 9:37:19 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

With all of their anger, you would think they would love the chance to kick the ass of a denier in a debate.


20 posted on 03/24/2014 10:42:36 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson