“Sorry Calling BS on your post. I have seen the movie.”
I’ve seen the movie too and I’m calling BS on your BS.
Please refute the movie’s premise that personal sacrifice was not required to restore the climate.
That is ~exactly~ the point Frozen makes. In fact it is the touchstone scene of the movie.
What sacrifice? Who died? Who, but the bad guy, lost anything? The Queen retained her title. The bad guy looking to cash in on the situation was dealt with. The good guys all lived happily ever after, and the snowman got his own personal biodome. Heck, even Sven got a new sleigh. The kindgom actually was better off having experienced the situation, as the gates were again open to commerce.
Lighten up Francis.
There is no climate agenda in Frozen. It is the retelling of a two hundred year old fairy tale. The sacrifice wasn’t made to save the climate, it was made to save her sister. There are much worse examples of Disney movies with an agenda, i.e. Pocahontas, Wall-E, Cars 2.
You can always find a boogeyman, if you look hard enough.
There is no AGW agenda in Frozen. It is in fact a really well done (in my opinion) cartoon of a very old fairy tale. Lighten up. Sheesh.