We’re dealing with a regime that gave new identities to dozens of Benghazi witnesses. Presumably that involved fake deaths.
Suggesting that they did the same thing to Fuddy is very reasonable, considering the numbers of people they put underground in the Benghazi cover-up - which shows this is the modus operandus of the current regime.
Once a thief has already been caught committing a couple dozen robberies it is no longer “controversial” to suggest that the same thief may have committed another robbery. The only people who would say it IS controversial after all that.... are people who want to Alinsky the issue rather than look at actual evidence.
We know them by their fruits - here on Free Republic as anywhere else.
I thought I was posting in response to your post. So ping to what I posted.