Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv; P-Marlowe; Renfield; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; decimon; 1010RD; ...
We can set our clocks by the media's efforts to misrepresent some document....it must be nearing either Christmas or Easter

The headline: "Not a modern fake"

No place in the Smithsonian article do these charlatans point out that this little fragment has been dated from 600-900 ad. ""An analysis published by American researchers in April 2014 showed that the fragment is ancient and dates to between the sixth and ninth centuries."

It is not thousands of years old. In fact, it is roughly 750 years after Christ's resurrection.

But...they knew that. And they know they're not saying what they know.

This article is a fake, a sham...a shame.

It's like me writing down a fake quote from an early American. Did you know that Thomas Jefferson said, "Burger King is my favorite hamburger."

There you have it. TJefferson's own words written by me 250 years later.

Surely, that makes it an accurate quote.

53 posted on 04/11/2014 8:46:17 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

My understanding is that being married would be normal for a Jewish male of Jesus’ age. Why is Jesus Christ marrying an issue?


76 posted on 04/12/2014 11:35:51 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson