Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugin

The NRA did most certainly support the ban of certain bullets. I remember it well.

Of course the media still attacked the NRA because they didn’t support banning all fmj bullets.

The bullets which caused the stir and which the NRA went along with banning was the teflon coated ones. I have forgotten the company’s name but it turned out that there had never been a cop killed by one of those bullets penetrating his vest.


11 posted on 04/11/2014 5:04:11 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog

They don’t want teflon coated bullets.

They don’t want steel core bullets.

They don’t want lead bullets.

They don’t want fragmenting bullets.

They don’t want hollow point bullets.

I’m starting to see a pattern here...


12 posted on 04/11/2014 5:08:11 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog

Got anything to document your claim? Of course they also pointed out that the language was so broad it would also ban lots of bullets besides the Teflon coated bullets that the media dubbed “cop killers”. That’s because the gun control crowd uses that tactic all the time. But that’s not the same thing as supporting banning those bullets. So who in the NRA supported it, and when?


23 posted on 04/11/2014 6:15:04 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson