Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Can we stop naming warships after people? It used to be only dead people. Now we name carriers after living people. Before 2017, we will probably have a U.S.S Barry Soetero and/or a U.S.S Barack Hussein Obama.

I prefer we stick to cities and states and persona names.


25 posted on 04/13/2014 9:11:45 PM PDT by TheArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheArizona

I prefer we stick to cities and states and NON persona names.


26 posted on 04/13/2014 9:20:31 PM PDT by TheArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: TheArizona
Destroyers have always been named after people, cruisers after cities, battleships after states and carriers after battles. Now, attack subs are named after cities as cruisers are being phased out, missile subs are named after states as the new "capital" ships, light carriers are named after battles, and big carriers are named after presidents. The Navy has its traditions.

All that said, I agree with you about about naming things after living people. The honoree should always be deceased and therefore unable to bring dishonor to or gain advantage from the naming.

30 posted on 04/13/2014 9:35:18 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: TheArizona

Oh, it’s only going to get worse, much worse....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/26/uss-harvey-milk-navy-ship_n_1456486.html


31 posted on 04/13/2014 9:38:27 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson