Could be a Reid connection here. Harry seems to have access to billions of federal dollars that he spends as he pleases....with no accountability.
==================================================
At first glance this episode looks like money-laundering tax dollars----with Reid, aiding and abetting Obama's desperation to buy aye votes for Obamacare.
NOTE THAT Landrieu was willing to take $200 million for her aye vote------but Harry "accidentally" gave her $4.3 BILLION. The spread is enormous....what exactly happened to the rest of the money?
The billions could have been laundered through Landrieu then redeposited elsewhere.
=================================================
THE GRUESOME DETAILS: In the fall of 2009, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev) was trying to get the necessary 60 Dimocrat votes to pass Obamacare. He needed every Dimocrat on board, which gave waffling senators a great deal of leverage.
In Sen Mary Landrieu's case, she connivingly saw that selling her aye vote could get her maybe $200 million federal dollars.
Obama complied. Reid chalked up another vote for Obamacare. Not $200 million---but $4.3 billion for Landrieu was attached to the Obamacare bill.
===================================
Where'd the money go? How $4.3 billion to Landrieu was attached to the Obamacare bill, and how Obama and Reid connived to get it there, is yet another indictment of the Obamacare atrocity.
The Reid/Obama payoff to Landrieu should be investigated:
(1) as an indication of how EVERY Democrat came to vote for Obamacare in an historic straight party line vote,
(2) how federal monies might have been laundered into the campaign coffers of Dummycrats,
(3) how federal monies came to be used as Harry's personal piggy bank.
Where is the GOP on this?? We have a Marxist Rep (Grijalva, Dim-AZ) writing a letter to the Secy of Interior asking for an investigation of the Koch Bros (?!) and their connection to the Bundy stand off.
Where are the Pubbies calling for the investigation of Dingy’s Dirty Deals??
(Silence, as the Dims write the narrative!)
Are we in a viscous circle where every time we need an investigation along with the accompanying referral to move it along it gets quashed by the AG Holder?