Skip to comments.
Should Elderly Drivers be Retested?
Westport News ^
Posted on 04/21/2014 2:47:33 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: nickcarraway
I think half the kids in Colorado should be tested.
2
posted on
04/21/2014 2:48:32 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: nickcarraway
According to statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the safest drivers are in the age group between 64 and 69 years old. And studies of the data reveal that teenage drivers especially male teenage drivers are the most dangerous drivers on the road.
3
posted on
04/21/2014 2:50:19 PM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
To: nickcarraway
Yes,yes,yes,YES! And I say that as one who's fast approaching an age where *I* might be required to re-test.
4
posted on
04/21/2014 2:50:46 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
To: nickcarraway
As soon as Joe “Brain Dead” Biden is...
5
posted on
04/21/2014 2:51:14 PM PDT
by
CGASMIA68
To: nickcarraway
Obammy care would like to kill all of them.
6
posted on
04/21/2014 2:51:22 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
("Remember me as you pass by, As you are now, so once was I, As I am now, so you will be," -Epitap)
To: nickcarraway
Young drivers are worse. At least that is true around here. Retest them.
7
posted on
04/21/2014 2:51:32 PM PDT
by
MamaB
To: mountainlion
I think if they were honest in their reporting, they would note that the number and severity of accidents by the over 55 age group is miniscule compared to the younger groups.
8
posted on
04/21/2014 2:52:13 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(FDR & Obama "brain trusts" ... Ivy League Professors, Progressive elite, & common criminals.)
To: nickcarraway
Yikes,there's carnage on the streets of Connecticut.For anyone not familiar with the area two of the towns mentioned,New Canaan and Darien,are both suburbs of New York City and are among the wealthiest residential communities ON EARTH!
9
posted on
04/21/2014 2:53:53 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
To: nickcarraway
The answer is yes, but the real question is, “How frequently?”
I knew an older neighbor who seemed perfectly rational at Christmas, but wandered off driving, parked his car, and died of exposure several months later. It was sad, but fortunately he didn’t take anyone with him. What frequency of testing would have anticipated a sudden decline without being oppressive?
To: RetiredTexasVet
I think if they were honest in their reporting, they would note that the number and severity of accidents by the over 55 age group is miniscule compared to the younger groups. Under 25 and over 75 are the two most dangerous groups of drivers in the country.The under 25's because of stupidity and/or testosterone...the over 75's because of failing eyes,ears and brains.
To: RetiredTexasVet
they would note that the number and severity of accidents by the over 55 age group is miniscule compared to the younger groups. That's true. Accident rate and overall accident count both low.
However, I just stopped my 97 YO mother from further driving. Has to be a limit somewhere.
12
posted on
04/21/2014 2:57:37 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature not nurture)
To: Pearls Before Swine
To: CGASMIA68
I hope so. It was hard on the family, whatever his intention.
To: Pearls Before Swine
If that was rapid-progression Alzheimer's (as opposed to a series of small strokes or CJD or something), it can be
very rapid. This is quite uncommon.
Sadly, you just can't catch every developing bad situation in life.
15
posted on
04/21/2014 3:01:26 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature not nurture)
To: nickcarraway
I'm sure there are seniors who are bad drivers who would pass a new test, and seniors who are good drivers who would fail. Why not just look at driving history and be quick to ticket senior drivers who have senior moments at the wheel? Then test them as part of determining if they (we) can keep our licenses. It would be simpler and more effective.
If seniors are going to be discouraged from driving, there would have to be a whole lot of progress in safe public transportation.
16
posted on
04/21/2014 3:02:55 PM PDT
by
grania
To: nickcarraway
Definitely retest, and include reaction time and decision making tests.
Had some old geezer turn left in front of me over forty years ago such that I hit the side of his car on my bike at about 50 mph.. Busted me up nicely.
Geezer kept on going, someone that saw it happen had to chase him down. Claimed he did not know anything happened.
To: Gay State Conservative
Under 25 and over 75 are the two most dangerous groups of drivers in the country I think what you are looking at in the older group is that accidents involving elderly tend to have more fatalities (the driver him/herself) because they are more frail. The accident rate itself has been going down about 1%/year for the older drivers.
18
posted on
04/21/2014 3:09:02 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature not nurture)
To: MamaB
Young drivers are worse. Can't disagree with that statement from what I have seen in all my years of driving.
19
posted on
04/21/2014 3:10:51 PM PDT
by
Ron H.
(Impeach, Indict & Imprison the criminal Barak Hussein Obama.)
To: nickcarraway
Dang it, driving in the passing lane at 45 with my left blinker on is the best part of getting old! BTT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson