How did this possibly make it through to the SC level? What bidniz of the Justices is it to decide whether a juice label is misleading?
If current law either zaps ‘em or let’s them go, so be it. And if there’s an outcry for stronger juice labeling, that can be handled legislatively.
Yeah, I get it that POM seems to think they have a claim against CC because of the label, but how could an appeals court not have handled this?
Cases like this usually make it because there is too much “confusion” in the rulings in the lower courts. Thus, the decision here is SUPPOSED to provide some sort of foundation for decisions in similar cases moving forward.