Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

I always thought there should be a multiplying factor to the Drake equation, whose value is 1 or 0. And the factor is if God wanted their to be life elsewhere. 1 if yes, 0 if no.


5 posted on 05/13/2014 1:51:06 PM PDT by wattsgnu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wattsgnu

I was somewhat impressed with the Drake Equation — until I learned that he was just one of Sagan’s cronies.


9 posted on 05/13/2014 1:52:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: wattsgnu

“I always thought there should be a multiplying factor to the Drake equation, whose value is 1 or 0. And the factor is if God wanted their to be life elsewhere. 1 if yes, 0 if no.”

Warning this is a rant. Read at your own risk.

You have been warned!

The Drake Equation is basically nonsense. Without actual knowledge of the probabilities of life - from an evolutionary perspective - it is simply garbage in and garbage out. It is actually an example of a logical fallacy because it is a false comparison. It does not mater how many stars there are or how many of them have planets. Yes, on one level it might even be truth but we have data to determine that level.

A+B=C but only when “A”,”B” &”C” have definitions beyond the literal phonetic because combining the “AHHH” or “AAAAE” sound with the “BEE” sound does not yield a “Cha” sound


32 posted on 05/13/2014 2:48:22 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson