Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global warming research suppressed due to intolerance of skepticism, claims scientist
Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 8:56AM BST 16 May 2014 | Claire Carter

Posted on 05/17/2014 9:49:47 PM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Sherman Logan
Yet people treat the computer projections as Fact, because they come out of a computer.

Yet global warming believers think a computer projection is a legitimate reason to transform of our standard of living dramatically...

21 posted on 05/18/2014 8:31:41 AM PDT by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: abclily; Jack Hydrazine

A 'little' perspective.

22 posted on 05/18/2014 9:02:20 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Its my freedom. YES. I will be keeping it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

One aspect of humanism, that we’re the center of the universe, so therefore also the cause of everything that can go wrong. It’s actually anti-humanism in the spiritual sense because they believe we’re only animals, just here for instinctive self-gratification.


23 posted on 05/18/2014 9:38:41 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Popman

I think there is excellent evidence mankind is causing an increase in CO2 and other greenhouse evidence. Indeed the evidence for this is indisputable.

But there are (at least) two additional levels of extrapolation from this fact that warmists often gloss over.

1. Since greenhouse gases are increasing, the atmosphere will heat up. The problem with this assumption is that there are many, many feedback systems in the ecosystem, many of which we don’t understand. We probably aren’t even aware of all of them.

Yet warmists make the unjustified assumption that all such feedback will be positive, increasing warming, or at least that the net effect of all the feedbacks will be positive.

It is as reasonable to assume that feedbacks will be neutral or even negative in effect.

2. Massive changes to our way of life is the best, indeed only, way to effectively address the warming caused by an increase in greenhouse gases. And that putting governments in charge of these changes is the only hope for mankind and the ecosystem.

Even if we were to assume that warming is happening exactly as claimed, the universal agreement among warmists that the only solution is to make government immensely more powerful is at the very least unproven.

Yet if you disagree with, or even express a lack of conviction regarding, any one of these points you will be denounced as a “denier.”


24 posted on 05/18/2014 10:14:02 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

>> A climate change researcher has claimed that scientists are confusing their role as impartial observers...

I had no idea where this story was going when I read the opening fragment; however, I appreciated its meaning which speaks to the political exploitation of science and trust — the realm of Climate Politics.


25 posted on 05/18/2014 4:07:49 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson