The irony is that although liberals will reject any religious influence in science, they’re just fine with political influence. It’s more like the science of the dark ages except that politics mandates a particular belief, similar to how the Earth-centered model of Aristotle was rigidly enforced.
Green crap is nothing but money laundering and crony payoffs.
Bengtsson’s peers are mad because he is messing with their livelihood. Should global warming grants dry up, they would have to get real jobs.
Another nail in the AGW coffin.
I remember when the scientific method required that a hypothesis be falsifiable - that contrary evidence could disprove a hypothesis. Today, Global Warming cannot be disproven because all possible evidence supports it.
Cold winter? Global Warming.
Warm winter? Global Warming.
Drought? Global Warming.
Floods? Global Warming.
Wildfires? Global Warming.
Election season? Global Warming.
This isn’t what science is supposed to mean, and the skeptics are the ones following the scientific method, being called names, and being told “the debate is over”. That last issue particularly irritates me; the debate is never over in real science.
You can’t have anything interfere with the gravy train.
When money talks, nobody walks.
Globull warming grants are Big Business and everyone’s got a hand out.
If the money’s right, few folks worry about personal integrity. They’re too busy thinking about that new Mercedes.
Wanting desparatly to tap into the tax base of every hardworking American to support the wolrd and its elitist dictators
Outstanding if true, especially since that is the tax-payers money buying that junk science.
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
The scientists on global warming and evolution and also the communists and Marxists all have the same agenda and that is to get our money at the point of a gun barrel.
I was sent a letter from the county a couple days ago telling me that if I wanted to vote in the primary I would have to affiliate my self with one party or another.
After studying the platforms of the constitution party I have decided to register as a constitutionalist as I pretty much agree with their platform which include not only global warming issues but they recognize God as out creator and the founder of this nation.
They are also more sensible on most other issues as is the libertarian party but unlike the libertarians they do not recognize homosexuality as a God given right.
I would encourage every one to do a little studying on the platforms of the different parties, because in case this earth is still livable tomorrow we do need a change.
I know a few global warming true believers....
I have never gotten a cogent response when I point out ALL global warming “science” is based on computer models and not empirical observable evidence..
If we can forecast weather for at best ten days with a decent degree of accuracy, how can we forecast weather for the next 100 years to the single degree of temperature change ?
And we are going to completely change our way of life to do so....
Isn’t that insane.
Most just give me a dumb look...
bm
>> A climate change researcher has claimed that scientists are confusing their role as impartial observers...
I had no idea where this story was going when I read the opening fragment; however, I appreciated its meaning which speaks to the political exploitation of science and trust — the realm of Climate Politics.