[onedoug]

Not even the ancient Greeks gave in to the idea of homosexual marriage. I suspect the idea would have appalled them as portending the downfall of their society. Even they were not intentionally suicidal.

[Ohioan]

The ancient Greeks may well have had the highest average IQ of any race in the historic period. They would certainly have understood--however corrupted at any period--that homosexual marriage is an oxymoron. The whole function of marriage, throughout the history of civilized peoples, is a sanctification of the process of human propagation & family formation. People who talk or write about any form of same-sex marriage, only demonstrate their confusion of the purpose of marriage.

Why, to make the point even more obvious, has a failure to consummate a marriage by a procreational act, been generally a ground for annulment? The principal ground for annulment? A muscular exercise, intended to simulate sensations associated with the procreational act, between people who do not have the equipment to procreate via that simulation, can never be the required consummation.

While I have not actually been graphic, I apologize to all for suggesting what if graphic would be offensive in a public comment. But my intent is simply to make a point that no amount of rationalized gobble can refute.

William Flax