1 posted on
05/31/2014 6:40:22 PM PDT by
massmike
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: massmike
They just want a piece of the “pipeline”.
2 posted on
05/31/2014 6:42:04 PM PDT by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Support Free Republic!)
To: massmike
What’s the bet Obama does exactly what they want? Please the deviants and the environazis.
3 posted on
05/31/2014 6:42:22 PM PDT by
Viennacon
To: massmike
Don’t like it? Sell your shares of XOM
To: massmike
To hell with the Homo-Mafia.
5 posted on
05/31/2014 6:48:52 PM PDT by
TomServo
To: massmike
At 1-3% of the population, I’m sure they’ve met the quota in normal hiring....
6 posted on
05/31/2014 6:52:51 PM PDT by
S.O.S121.500
(Had ENOUGH Yet ? ........................ Enforce the Bill of Rights ......... It's the LAW !!!)
To: massmike
Comply with thier demands, do you hear this?
To: massmike
If you want to drill in the Middle East, you must be careful as to exactly what type of ‘drilling’ you support.
Don’t think for a minute that Exxon is any different than other big companies - but in the case of Exxon, they have a LOT TO LOSE by not taking on the gay mafia.
9 posted on
05/31/2014 7:03:14 PM PDT by
BobL
To: kingattax
Please forgive me...i am so BAD! I started to read this article and a vision popped into my head of a bunch of roughnecks in Hard hats and pink leotards slaving away on an offshore oil rig.
10 posted on
05/31/2014 7:05:28 PM PDT by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: massmike
They are tasked with drilling for oil. Not feces.
To: massmike
Too bad. Sodomy is not a prerequisite for oil exploration, nor a corporation’s bottom line.
12 posted on
05/31/2014 7:10:45 PM PDT by
Fungi
To: massmike
If the homos would just recognize that being a homo is a mental disorder, then they’d be covered under the policy.
As long as they contend that their perverted lifestyle is normal, then they are outside the discrimination policy.
20 posted on
05/31/2014 7:55:05 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
To: massmike
This is one reason why I always shop at Exxon Mobile if I have a choice (in the area)!!!!
22 posted on
05/31/2014 8:47:24 PM PDT by
JSDude1
To: massmike
What are the “openly gay” homosexuals going to do? Boycott them? ROTFL! Sexual deviants are sickos.
23 posted on
05/31/2014 8:49:21 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
To: massmike
DiNapoli is like Cuomo. They just can’t stand to have those evil free enterprise type organizations in New York. Gotta find a way to ‘encourage’ them to get outta da state!
24 posted on
05/31/2014 9:04:16 PM PDT by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
To: massmike
“The company has also offered full benefits to legally married same-sex couples since the Supreme Court struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 2012.”
Exxon has already given in to the homosexual activists and give benefits to the gays and their lovers.
To: massmike
...called on Barack Obama to issue an executive order forcing the company to comply with their demands. Huh?!?
-PJ
26 posted on
05/31/2014 9:57:56 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: massmike
...or mental disability, ...
***********************************
Yep. Already covered.
It’s becoming beyond tiresome to see the constant pushing for special status by the LGBT crowd.
27 posted on
05/31/2014 10:03:46 PM PDT by
octex
To: massmike
“But homosexual activists say its not enough”
Isn’t that kind of what they always say?
28 posted on
05/31/2014 10:21:25 PM PDT by
DemforBush
(A repo man is always intense.)
To: massmike
" . . . will be evaluated without regard to race, color, sex, religion, national origin, citizenship status, age, genetic information, physical or mental disability, veteran or other legally protected status.
So they will hire a mentally disabled person to be their corporate spokesperson, and a physically disabled person to perform complex physical tasks?
To: massmike
They’re covered already under the “mental disability” protection.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson