Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainlion

I don’t know why some of you work so hard to keep yourselves behind the 8 ball with your computers.

If the update is free, why not update your computer?

Would you have stayed with XP service pack one and keep complaining about it’s flaws, instead of updating it?


3 posted on 06/03/2014 2:22:57 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

I would have stayed with 95 if they supported it.


12 posted on 06/03/2014 2:40:14 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

Windows 2000 was great. Until you load the service packs.

Started out using only 35 megabytes of RAM for the OS and it was extremely fast. After the updates, it was as bloated as XP and just as slow.


32 posted on 06/03/2014 3:31:12 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

because microsoft has a history of putting out patches and updates that screw up a currently working computer , and changing things to the point you can’t roll it back to previously working condition.


61 posted on 06/03/2014 5:20:57 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson