Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Best Linux Distribution for New Users
Linux.com ^ | 6 June 2014 | Jack Wallen

Posted on 06/11/2014 8:51:19 AM PDT by ShadowAce

This is a debate that most certainly brings out the beast in many a Linux user. The argument doesn't generally boil down to which distribution is truly best suited for new users, but which distribution is favored by those in the debate. If we set our personal preferences aside, a clearer picture can arise. But even that clarity can quickly get obscured by the needs and desires of the new users. Given that, I decided to take a different approach to finding the “best distro for new users." My criteria for best distribution must not only be easy to use, but also must appeal to a more modern design aesthetic brought about by the ever-growing thrust of the mobile interface metaphor.

For the purposes of this examination, to be included in the short list a distribution must: 

Let me explain each criteria.

User-friendliness

This is such a hotly debatable topic. But the truth of the matter is – a new user must be able to pick up a flavor of Linux and just start using it, with little to no explaining. If too much explanation must be given, then the distribution is not user friendly. I hate to be that guy, but nearly any user can sit in front of a Windows 7 or OS X desktop and start using it with almost zero coaching. That is what every Linux desktop should shoot for.

Common apps

Users should not have to install the necessities out of the box. Period. And just what are the necessities? The list grows shorter every year. Currently, the list of must-have apps are:

That's the short list of apps nearly every user depends upon.

App store

Thanks to that ever-growing dependency on mobile devices, users have grown accustomed to app stores. Linux has had these for quite some time (Synaptic being one of the oldest). Without a well thought-out app store, users will struggle with adding software in the Linux environment. This is, without a doubt, crucial.

Modern interface

I've mentioned the mobile landscape a number of times already. Thanks to iOS and Android, users have grown fond of the modern UI. The desktop needs to follow suit and draw the attention of users with a unique, modern, yet easy-to-use interface. The old metaphor is no longer as effective in a multi-touch-friendly, mobile world.

Top three distros

With the criteria in place, which distributions meet (or exceed) our needs? First, let's examine the top three candidates. Each of the following meets (or exceeds) the criteria.

Ubuntu

Ubuntu Linux has long reigned the king of user-friendly Linux. Out of the box, it's a challenge to find a desktop (Unity) that is more engaging and easy to use... even for those unfamiliar to the platform. The desktop layout, although different, is logical and intuitive. With the addition of one of the single most powerful search tools of any desktop environment, Ubuntu Unity should be considered a crowning achievement among the Linux faithful.

Linux Mint

If there is a distribution set to usurp the crown from the king, it is Linux Mint. Linux Mint takes a more standard approach to the desktop, but layers just enough eye candy and variation to make it stand out from the long-in-the-tooth desktop metaphor. Linux Mint is based on Ubuntu, so it does benefit from the stability and reliability found in its big brother.

Linux Deepin

New to the user-friendly list is Linux Deepin. This relatively new distribution hails from China and should be making some serious waves. Why? Because it takes the Linux desktop and turns it into a thing of artistic beauty; while at the same time retaining a high level of user-friendliness. When the newest iteration of this distribution is released, I expect big things. Linux Deepin takes the GNOME 3 desktop and retools it into something completely different and completely marvelous.

Scoring the Distros

With the top contenders listed, let's compare each to our criteria and rank each. Scoring for the distributions is as such: For each criteria, the distributions are ranked first to last (first getting 1 point, last getting 3 points). In the end, all scores are totaled to determine the winner -- lowest score wins.

User-friendliness

This is probably the tightest of categories and hardest to judge. Each distribution is tops in user-friendliness in different ways. In the end, I'd rank the top three:

1. Linux Mint

2. Ubuntu Linux

3. Linux Deepin

Why? Mint gains a slight edge simply because it still holds to the old metaphor of start menu, task bar, and desktop icons. The margin of victory is incredibly slim though, as both Ubuntu and Linux Deepin require next to zero learning curve – even for the yet-to-be-initiated.

Common apps

The only reason this category is hard to judge is because each distribution includes all of the necessary applications. Although Linux Deepin currently offers Kingsoft Office (one of the finest mobile office suite solutions), the plans are to default to LibreOffice in the 2014 release.

One of my issues with the common apps falls into that of audio players. Though I stream a lot of music (using the Spotify client), when I play music on my local drive, I always use Clementine. The default players are:

Of the three, Banshee (Figure 1) offers the most features, DMusic (Figure 2) offers the best interface, and (surprisingly enough) Rhythmbox (Figure 3) is, by far, the least reliable.

banshee

dmusic

rhythmbox

So, how do they score? Like so:

1. Linux Mint

2. Ubuntu Linux

3. Linux Deepin

App store

This category cannot go without being addressed. Why? Because the app store can easily make or break a Linux distribution for a new user. There will always be apps needed and no new user wants to jump through the hoops of learning the command line. Each distribution has their own take on the app store.

It should be said, that each of these tools is based on the Ubuntu Software Center. What is odd about this is that it is the Ubuntu Software Center that lands squarely on the bottom. The primary reason for this is the Ubuntu Software Center is very slow – even on an incredibly powerful machine.

I would order the app stores as such:

1. Linux Deepin

2. Linux Mint

3. Ubuntu Linux

Each of the app stores functions in a very similar manner. The reason Linux Deepin gets the top bill is twofold: The interface is easier to navigate and the application opens far faster than either the Ubuntu Software Manager or the Mint Software Manager.

Modern interface

This is the category in which Linux Mint falls way, way behind. Even though it does offer a bit of eye candy and a more shallow learning curve, Linux Mint still suffers from what is, by comparison, a very outdated desktop. Even on powerful hardware (with solid graphics), Linux Mint still looks like it could very easily have been transported from the late 1990s. To that end, we must look to either Ubuntu Linux or Linux Deepin to bring us into the future. The winner is:

1. Linux Deepin

2. Ubuntu Linux

3. Linux Mint

What Linux Deepin does is use GNOME 3 to create an amalgam of GNOME and OSX that works so beautifully, you think you're dealing with a piece of interactive art.

The overall winner

Although this is very rudimentary, the order of our best Linux distro for new users would be:

1. Linux Mint with a collective score of 7

2. Linux Deepin with a collective score of 8

3. Ubuntu Linux with a collective score of 9

If you're wondering about the 'writer opinion' of this piece, know this: I have used Ubuntu Linux for years (and still do). I have recently been quoted as saying “If there's a Linux distro that will sway me from Ubuntu, it's Linux Deepin.” Although I appreciate Linux Mint for what it is, I only use it for testing purposes. With that said, Linux Mint is the clear winner, when it comes to best Linux distribution for new users.

Here's the real truth of this matter – you can't go wrong with any of these Linux desktops. They each shine in their own right. If you're looking for a true beauty, go with Linux Deepin. If you want a combination of beauty and ease of use, go with Ubuntu Linux. If you just want simplicity and you don't care about eye candy, go with Linux Mint. No matter which way you go, it's a win-win-win scenario.

What do you think? How would you rank the three chosen desktops? Or, would you write in a completely different Linux distribution for best in show for the new users (and why)?


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: linux

1 posted on 06/11/2014 8:51:19 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; Still Thinking; ...

2 posted on 06/11/2014 8:51:43 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Best linux = almost as easy as XP.

If you want a quick and easy intro linux try RoboLinux it found both of my oddball usb nics, not an easy task!


3 posted on 06/11/2014 8:56:04 AM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

I have heard a couple of good things about Robolinux. I’ve never tried it, though, as I am pretty well entrenched in Fedora.


4 posted on 06/11/2014 8:57:05 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Don’t disagree with the result, but the authors initial requirements and stipulations are BS


5 posted on 06/11/2014 8:58:34 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Agreed. No Flash player? Also, I would add privacy concerns. I understand hat Ubuntu is VERY chatty with the mother ship. Linux shouldn’t go that route.


6 posted on 06/11/2014 9:15:47 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("If you’re litigating against nuns, you’ve probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Yeah. Good thing they all have access to Flash for later install.


7 posted on 06/11/2014 9:21:29 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I use visio, Sonar, Winamp, Adobe photoshop and video editing software, Sonar sound editing software, Nero cd & DVD burning software, a number of free apps for things like ripping CD’s to MP3, etc. and still play command and conquer, I also use Microsoft office tools that I know can be replaced by open office easily.

But other than the Microsof Office stuff, do any of those things work on Lynux? When they do, I’ll make the switch. Gladly. Until they do, I won’t.


8 posted on 06/11/2014 9:21:49 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

By what standard(s) is a modern user interface defined in this comparison?


9 posted on 06/11/2014 9:22:10 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Good question. I use XFCE and it’s very streamlined, and it works the way I do.


10 posted on 06/11/2014 9:24:14 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

One vote for Mint, although I haven’t tried Deepin yet. It’s what I give users who don’t want the hassles of a proprietary OS. I love Linux but I will still repeat Jamie Zawinski’s comment - “Linux is only free if your time has no value.” There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.


11 posted on 06/11/2014 9:26:08 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
Visio--pretty difficult. Not sure it it'll work under WINE.

Sonar--never heard of it, but Linux does have several audio editing tools. My son uses one called MixCraft that he seems to like a lot.

Winamp--no problem. Several apps look and feel just like it., though there are better ones out there.

PhotoShop--Now it's getting into the heavy hitters. The closest (which probably isn't good enough for you) is GIMP

Video editing--there are several good ones. I don't do video editing, so I'm not aware of the titles off th etop of my head, though I have seen quite a few articles about this genre of software.

DVD burning--piece of cake. I can rip/burn DVDs, download video (and extract the audio) from youtube, etc.

Games? I ton. Steam just announced they've hit the 500 game mark for Steam Linux. This morning, I saw that Civ V was announced as a native port to Linux.

12 posted on 06/11/2014 9:28:48 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

What do you mean by streamlined? That suggested something other than appearance.

The article mentions a dated appearance for one of the packages, but if the dated appearance is ultimately more usable and faster to manage, that matters more to me than what the desktop looks like when it is sitting idle.


13 posted on 06/11/2014 9:29:45 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

To me, “streamlined” means no unnecessary bells and whistles (at least by default). No fancy fading in and out, eye-candy sort of stuff. It still does everything I ask of it, though.


14 posted on 06/11/2014 9:35:19 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

M4L


15 posted on 06/11/2014 9:36:20 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (You can count my felonies by looking at my FR replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I see, thanks.


16 posted on 06/11/2014 9:37:16 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I don’t consider WINE an alternative.

I used to have a dual boot machine when I used OS2 Warp. I also used to have a Beta VCR (both far superior to the compettion, btw.)

Never again. My computer is now a commodity, not an occupation. It is a tool that I use like a car. I don’t want to have to be a mechanic any more just to use it.

And FWIW, I’m in IT and had to become a dos memory management expert to get Aces over the Pacific to work in DOS mode on my Windows 3.1 machine back in the early 90’s.

I also tried Ubunto several years ago.

I’m done with that nonsense.


17 posted on 06/11/2014 9:38:20 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Bookmark


18 posted on 06/11/2014 9:59:21 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Common apps
Most applications are user-specific. Internet browser, yes, everyone uses that. LibreOffice, not bad. But who uses an email client outside of work? Browser-based email is, I would think, what most people are used to. This isn't a phone where such apps make it easier.

App Store
What? Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but who uses an app store on a laptop or desktop? You download an installer off a website, or stick a CD in the drive. Command-line install is pretty easy on Linux, if you know what you're looking for, it's easy enough to find the line needed. The closest thing to an app store I ever use is Steam. The only reason Linux would need this at all is because there isn't a wide variety of Linux-compatible installers for many programs.

Modern Interface
Huh? As in a desktop? A start menu?

But what other distros did we look at for this article? Or did the guy just pick three, and then compare them?
19 posted on 06/11/2014 11:09:59 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I downloaded Linux Mint a while back, don’t use it much anymore, a couple of things, I can run youtube vids, but can’t run Netflix; I found a youtube vid on how to run it, but that didn’t work.

The other thing is scrolling, when I am scrolling by mouse or arrow, there is constant wave on the screen, too annoying to contend with, especially for as much time as I spend on FR, which is 80% scrolling.

It’s there if I need it when something happens to windows.


20 posted on 06/11/2014 11:21:03 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I switched from Windows XP to Linux Mint and am very pleased with the move. It was a very natural transition. I used Ubuntu off-and-on prior to the Unity interface. Once Unity became the standard, I had to give it up. Unity is to Ubuntu what Metro is to Windows. I find them both equally unintuitive and my frustration level rose while using them.


21 posted on 06/11/2014 11:24:45 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real

This is the year for Linux.

Again.


22 posted on 06/11/2014 11:32:06 AM PDT by adorno (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
The author assumes that everyone prefers the Gnome or Gnome-style desktops, as well as disregarding the fact that not everyone has the newest and cutting-edge machines and needs a more general-purpose distro that can work well with older platforms.

I prefer KDE, YMMV.

That's the one thing about the 'doze OS. Much as I personally dislike it for various reasons, it works across pretty much all PC machines.

Also, I question some of his other positions. Web browser? If you don't like the default one (usually Firefox) pretty much all distros allow you to easily download and install many others. Or they can install Opera from the homepage.

Email client? Please. I use Fastmail.fm for emails and it does not care what OS or browser you use to access it. Plus, Opera comes with a built-in email client so no big whoop there.

Office suites are fine for those who need them (I don't), but if you don't like the default one so badly that you want to change it then downloading and installing a different one is not a problem.

Music files: don't care. If I want to listen to music I'll put on a music CD. I do not need to waste this computer's processing power on playing music over cheap computer speakers. Don't care about streaming audio either, although I believe Amarok should be able to handle it.

Hey, some people claim to need an RSS app. My list of needs does not include that.

"That's the short list of apps nearly every user depends upon."

Actually, that's a personal opinion -not A Standard.

23 posted on 06/11/2014 11:46:28 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the mooslimbs trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1
If you want a quick and easy intro linux try RoboLinux...

Tried Robo for the virtual machine app it bragged about having set up in its default config.

Then found out if you wanted to install an actual virtual OS in their 'default' app, you had to Donate A Small Fee to use their preconfigured version.

Promptly uninstalled.

24 posted on 06/11/2014 11:52:16 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the mooslimbs trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
For the Linux n00bs among us:

I like Xubuntu for ease of a) installation and b) overall use on older PCs/laptops. It's essentially Ubuntu with a more basic Graphical User Interface, so it doesn't require as much CPU/graphics card power.

Xubuntu runs like a charm on a 10 year-old P4 Toshiba satellite laptop and 8 year-old Acer Celeron laptop.

If you have an old XP machine sitting around, give Xubuntu a try!

25 posted on 06/11/2014 12:36:41 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

BFL


26 posted on 06/11/2014 12:39:57 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Netflix ... a legitimate gripe. Hulu works on Mint, but Netflix does not. I suspect the problem lies with Netflix and the hooks the mainstream operating systems have driven into them. Do you know if Netflix works on *any* Linux distribution? It is a bit of a frustration.


27 posted on 06/11/2014 12:48:01 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

After much distro hopping, I settled on PCLinuxOS. Everything has just worked out of the box on everything I’ve installed it on, old and new. KDE for newer machines; LXDE for the antiques.


28 posted on 06/11/2014 12:49:59 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Netflix uses Microsoft’s Silverlight for the Digital Rights Management (DRM). Android tablets and phones (running a Linux OS underneath) don’t have a problem. Perhaps licensing money has changed hands.


29 posted on 06/11/2014 12:56:25 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I use Pale Moon browser on my Ubuntu and I do not miss Firefox one bit


30 posted on 06/11/2014 2:47:28 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson