Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: riverss

I guess it depends on what you define as “the North.”

In 1860 the term generally meant the free states, in which there were no slaves, so I fail to see how the South could get slaves from them.


25 posted on 06/17/2014 1:13:35 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Well I guess that answered itself then.

The South would have to have kept all the slaves in the South if they had taken the bait.
Just a back door way of making sure all the slaves didn’t end up in the North to live.
I don’t know how they were treated up North at that time.


26 posted on 06/17/2014 1:30:38 PM PDT by riverss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson