Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Zed

Geez, I took it as him not having private parts. I didn’t think it was this... ugh. Thanks for ruining the movie for me, Mr. Ferguson.


6 posted on 06/25/2014 7:43:56 PM PDT by Thorliveshere (Minnesota Survivor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Thorliveshere

Homosexual or not, that has no place in an alleged kids film.

I’m sick to death of all the “catering to ‘adults’” in kids films in my lifetime. Never mind the other problems. As if truly mature classy adults cannot handle no-sex jokes in their kids films.


12 posted on 06/25/2014 7:57:36 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Thorliveshere

I’d heard there was a reference in the movie, but when I heard it I thought the same thing: the character is missing all sorts of body parts already, not having man-parts would be in pretty good keeping with all that.


23 posted on 06/26/2014 5:59:16 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson