Where in the Constitution does it say that the President shall not be evaluated for treason and/or enemy combatant status in the same way that anybody else is?
Seems to me that equal protection and due process demand that he BE evaluated by the same standards in all matters of the law.
If Obama took a vacation to Hawaii and then nuked Washington DC, what would the Constitution say should be done about it? What role, if any, does the War Powers Act play in that, or Congress’ standing authorization for the military to detain terrorist enemy combatants in defense of this nation?
That’s what the Constitution says about the role of the military in defense of this nation. The Congress is to authorize the military, and they’ve already given standing authorization for the military to detain enemy combatants - even “belligerents” which is a much lower standard and isn’t even defined - recognizing that the warfare against us is not 2 armies lining up and shooting at each other in an open field. Our enemies today pose as our friends in order to get access to us and kill us. That’s why we have the NDAA, duly passed into law.
What you are saying writes out of the Constitution Congress’ vital role in authorizing war. Is that really what you want to do?
The Constitution does make provision for what you say ... it’s called “Impeachment” and then “Conviction”.
Of course we saw how that worked for Clinton in the Senate.