To: nickcarraway
"The gray area comes in when nonmilitary actors, usually companies, feel that the only way to defend against a threat or attack is to strike back at the machines it originates from, either to mitigate the immediate harm by taking the offending machines offline or to retaliate and deter future attacks."I can't get behind retaliation or deterrence - we have courts for that - but avoiding immediate harm seems like clear defense of one's property rights. It's like disabling the flamethrower of the guy trying to torch your house.
2 posted on
06/28/2014 3:19:49 PM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: nickcarraway
This is not an arms issue. That’s only raised to malign the NRA and the RKBA which deals with physical threats and deterrence.
This is virtual trespass and theft or destruction of property.
To: nickcarraway
So Some old old school layer 1 hacking with a machete ?
4 posted on
06/28/2014 5:18:59 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson