Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2014 3:10:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
"The gray area comes in when nonmilitary actors, usually companies, feel that the only way to defend against a threat or attack is to strike back at the machines it originates from, either to mitigate the immediate harm by taking the offending machines offline or to retaliate and deter future attacks."

I can't get behind retaliation or deterrence - we have courts for that - but avoiding immediate harm seems like clear defense of one's property rights. It's like disabling the flamethrower of the guy trying to torch your house.

2 posted on 06/28/2014 3:19:49 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

This is not an arms issue. That’s only raised to malign the NRA and the RKBA which deals with physical threats and deterrence.

This is virtual trespass and theft or destruction of property.


3 posted on 06/28/2014 3:46:02 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

So Some old old school layer 1 hacking with a machete ?


4 posted on 06/28/2014 5:18:59 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson