Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Obama, loss of the Senate could be freeing
Wa Po ^ | 7-4-2014 | DANA MILBANK

Posted on 07/05/2014 11:20:40 PM PDT by Citizen Zed

There would be no more excuses for Republicans’ failure to put forward their own health-care plan, immigration proposals, specific cuts to popular government programs, and pet causes involving abortion, birth control and gay rights. This would set up real clashes with Obama — who could employ the veto pen he hasn’t used a single time since Republicans gained control of the House in 2010 — and sharp contrasts that would put him on the winning side of public opinion.

It is not hard to imagine a Republican takeover of the Senate causing conservatives in both chambers to overreach. House Republicans would get more pressure from their base to take a swing at impeachment, because the odds of convicting Obama in the Senate would be better (if still prohibitive). Alternatively, Republican leaders, recognizing that the public will hold them responsible now that they have complete control of Congress, might try to compromise with Obama.

In the first scenario, marauding conservatives drive Republicans to oblivion in 2016 and beyond, putting Hillary Clinton in the White House. In the second scenario, Obama actually accomplishes something in his last two years.

Of course, there is a third scenario, in which a Republican Senate majority only makes Obama miserable.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: reefdiver

WaPo anticipating impeachment? If it were a conservative WH, they would be leading the effort.


21 posted on 07/06/2014 3:03:26 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

“Dana is drinking double purple koolaid shots.”

It should probably read “Dana is eating purple microdot”


22 posted on 07/06/2014 3:08:56 AM PDT by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Like clinton the republican senate will save his a## and elevate him to a great president in his followers eyes


23 posted on 07/06/2014 3:10:16 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth
Dana is drinking double purple koolaid shots.


24 posted on 07/06/2014 3:53:17 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Freeing him up, to go to jail. That’s a win-win.


25 posted on 07/06/2014 3:54:36 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
would put Obama on the winning side of public opinion

Lol. Republicans are dumb but not that dumb. They will pass all kinds of wildly (publicly) popular bills like the Keystone pipeline passage, Obamacare individual mandate repeal, energy exploration (oil fracking coal), EPA oversight, tax cuts, votes on IRS -- all things that Obama is on the wrong side of 70% public approval.
26 posted on 07/06/2014 4:32:27 AM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline is for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

First off, the GOP isn’t the radical force this article suggests. Ideally, they would simply start passing bills that finally move the country away from socialism. This would include real step wise immigration reform, an alternative to ACA, and tax a social program reforms. Obamas refusal to sign these bills would then set up the basis for the 2016 Presidential campaign arguments.


27 posted on 07/06/2014 4:46:29 AM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Yes, there would be many things that he would get “for free” in Federal prison.


28 posted on 07/06/2014 4:52:09 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

He might as well lose the Senate. He lost his mind and that freed him up from dealing with reality.


29 posted on 07/06/2014 5:06:58 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

PROPAGANDA in our Time!

The US News has yet again demonstrated why it cannot be trusted - EVER!

So glad I don’t watch those idiots anymore...2 hrs to get 3 news stories while the rest of it is stupid issues and commercials...


30 posted on 07/06/2014 5:24:48 AM PDT by BCW (Amazon Books: "Babylon's Covert War" - the Iraq conflict explained in detail - by JH White)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Don’t forget the Republican gay marriage plan and their IRS expansion!

Liberals are so delusional they assume everyone agrees with them.


31 posted on 07/06/2014 5:29:35 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
"For Obama, loss of the Senate could be freeing"

Let's give it a try, shall we?

32 posted on 07/06/2014 5:33:35 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Let’s free Mr. Obama, BIG TIME (As in he should lose the Senate by a large margin..)!


33 posted on 07/06/2014 6:17:56 AM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
because the odds of convicting Obama in the Senate would be better (if still prohibitive). Alternatively, Republican leaders, recognizing that the public will hold them responsible now that they have complete control of Congress, might try to compromise with Obama.

Prohibitive in what way Dana? If Bush 43 had done all the illegal things 0 bummer has done, you and the rest of the SRM would have been screaming for impeachment. Compromise with the idiot in chief? Up yours Dana. I'd have him turning boulders into powder for the rest of his live in Ft Leavenworth, with mooch next to him.

34 posted on 07/06/2014 6:29:02 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Got a headache reading the first 100 replies out of 3k+ at the site. I should take up debating, just can’t get this spider-web brain of mine to take one point at a time.


35 posted on 07/06/2014 8:13:55 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson