Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative Vet
Shilts, by the way, was in a monogamous relationship and disapproved of that lifestyle, but one of his partners wasn't monogamous.

ONE of his partners? Was he monogamous one gay lover at a time?

30 posted on 07/07/2014 11:40:53 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

I’m late in seeing these replies. I hurriedly wrote that. The point I was trying to make is that the gay lifestyle is inherently risky for diseases like AIDS. Even if someone like Shilts claims to be monogamous, he is at risk from all of his previous partners and all of their partners etc.

I just know that he seemed to disapprove of the San Francisco bathhouse tradition of anonymous sex. That’s why the disease spread so rapidly in the gay community (plus anal sex is much more likely to result in semen interacting with the blood than straight vaginal sex).

I don’t have a problem with excluding them and agree that monogamy in that community is rare. If I get bored with my wife, I could go to a bar but chances are against me hooking up with someone right away. If a gay man is decent looking, they’ll have no problems hooking up with a complete stranger.


56 posted on 07/09/2014 10:38:16 PM PDT by Conservative Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson