[struggle]

Nope. Blood transfusion is emergency treatment.

Abortifacients are prophylactic.

[taterjay]

One might die without a blood transfusion but will not die not using birth control. But the Birth control can kill a person. Thirdly, yes, why can’t people understand they can pay for it themselves.

[Laissez-faire capitalist]

That isn't the issue. The issue is that Obamacare (which I am opposed to, and have posted threads against Obamcare here at FR ad nauseum) would cover the blood transfusion.

1.) If you have just as many who own a company as who brought the case from Hobby lobby to the SC, or 2.) an owner(s) have enough employees at a company for it to meet the threshold of either paying a fine or providing EBP’s (I am not sure what the present Obama adm. threshold # is right now) then they can say that they in good conscience cannot support blood transfusions being on their EBP’s - and thus they are going to let the gov’t (ObamaCare) foot the bill, or let their employees pay out-of-pocket.

The same scenario could happen with vasectomies or infertility treatments, as has been pointed out.