Skip to comments.Trego Co. man will stand trial for murder in abortion pill case
Posted on 07/13/2014 8:26:35 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Scott Bollig, 30, will stand trial on first-degree murder and aggravated battery, a judge decided on Friday. In February, police claim Bollig confessed to crushing an abortion pill and mixing it into pancakes, then feeding them to a woman who was 8-weeks-pregnant.
(Excerpt) Read more at kwch.com ...
I am surprised too but he needs to rot.
Yep she coulda went to a clinic and legally have done the same thing.
He murdered a clump of cells, a parasite?
This has to become a death penalty offense. And the manufacture of the dam pills should be outlawed!
This can’t be.
For 2 weeks now, the left has been telling us there is no such thing as an “abortion pill”. Only contraceptives.
What a travesty this is even an issue.
Right! Post this story link in reply to the Hobby Lobby bashers.
we make choices in this world and if we had a few more morals the question of how, when, if, and where to kill an unborn baby would never come up, because we would be responsible adults with character...
On what basis do you say this? Other than you yourself are female?
How can you murder what “isn’t alive”?
How can this be murder when the dead fetus at Ft. Hood was “not”?
Liberals are screwy. Oh wait, they lie like Stalinists.
They know it is death. They just lie to those who bring it up.
He didn’t want to be “punished with a baby”.
Scott Robert Bollig, from Wakeeney, Kansas, allegedly crushed up the drug on January 26 before giving it to his girlfriend, 36-year-old Naomi Abbott, who was between eight and ten weeks pregnant.
The statute, Alexa’s Law, allows prosecutors to charge someone with murder, manslaughter or battery for intentionally harming a fetus.
Under the law, when a pregnant woman is attacked, prosecutors can charge the assailant with a crime against the woman and a separate crime against the baby, but the law excludes abortion.
It is not clear how long the couple had been dating but Abbott, who has two sons from a previous relationship, divorced just over a year earlier, according to records.
She is listed as a witness in the complaint, along with Kansas Bureau of Investigation agents, registered nurses and bank and post office workers.
Trego County Sheriff Richard Hanks confirmed that Abbott is an employee in his office so although the crime allegedly occurred there, it is being dealt with by a neighboring county, Hays.
if the woman did this there’d be no story.
woman exercises “choice” not to be a mom and the world celebrates.
guy exercises his choice not to be a dad and ATM and we can’t have that.
i think it’s sick in either case but it’s hypocritical to only give one person choice when it’s the same act.
“Men don’t have to give birth. So they have no say.”
I hear this in every abortion conversation.
Good point; this is horrible, but girlfriends do this every day (sometimes to children the guys want). I am married almost twenty years, so dating is in the distant past, but I couldn’t imagine setting myself up to be a father of an unwanted child.
If men would do some research as to the steps women will go through to get pregnant (especially in their 30s), they’d be much more careful.
Just another “birth control” method Hobby Lobby refuses to pay for?
I didn’t know this was a random act by a restaurant worker. I thought it was the woman’s boyfriend; the baby’s father.
The drug is called Cytotec.
The only reason I know about it is because I was in the hospital for unknown AB pain, now I’m 60+ yrs old, very drug allergic, so I googled the drug before I accepted it. When the word ABORTION was so high on the list of side effects, I immediately REFUSED it. Both on Religious grounds and the fact that you do NOT give a person with unknown AB pain a drug that will cause more AB PAIN!
Doctor is now former doctor.
From what I have read, it was NOT.
But just imagine being a pregnant woman lifting a bite of food to your mouth. Unless you are absolutely positive of who prepared it, just wow! And there are a lot of crazy liberals and femnazis in this world.
This just seems like a completely frightening situation to me.
Meanwhile the woman can abort all the way up to the delivery date, and after delivery can give the kid up for adoption.
I can see him making a case under "equal protection", that if the biological mother can kill the child without it being murder, the biological father should have the same option.
I'm going to guess that the man didn't like the idea of paying 18 to 21 years of child support. It used to be the case in many states that a man was not obligated to pay child support for a child not conceived within marriage, unless he voluntarily chose to. Then the Supreme Court struck that down. Perhaps it should be brought back, to eliminate the motive for this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.