[chrisser]

If this is true:

"Hence one of the well-noted contradictions of the left: that marriage is only something to be celebrated when gay people do it. To these leftists, homosexuals are only interesting insofar as they can be used as an instrument of subversion."

Then

"Perhaps it’s time to spend a little less time worrying about gay marriage and more time worrying about plain old regular marriage, among other cultural disasters."

this statement doesn't make much sense. Worrying about gay marriage is worrying about plain old regular marriage because gay marriage is being used to subvert regular marriage.

[Tax-chick]

Worrying about gay marriage is worrying about plain old regular marriage ...

I agree. Homosexual "marriage" is sterile, rarely exclusive, and usually of short duration. These are pathologies of legitimate marriage, not beneficial elements.

As Mrs. Don-o says, heterosexuals invented gay marriage. Homosexuals' participation is a late, but surely reasonable, development.

[rlmorel]

Exactly.

[PapaBear3625]

this statement doesn't make much sense. Worrying about gay marriage is worrying about plain old regular marriage because gay marriage is being used to subvert regular marriage.

Fewer people are engaging in regular marriage, and I don't think it has anything to do with gay marriage.

An increasing number of guys have lost interest in marriage because they don't want to be sodomized by the divorce courts.