Posted on 07/28/2014 12:05:45 PM PDT by Citizen Zed
The paper argues that when you prevent banks from making risky bets with their own money, they wont stop betting. Theyre banks, after all. Instead, they will put more of their money into stuff that is less risky. And they will lend more, which is also risky, but allowed by Dodd-Frank. Also, the banks will pay dividends, which doesnt sound risky. But if you allow banks to use their capital to pay dividends, they wont have as much money around to cover loans when they go bad.
(Excerpt) Read more at fortune.com ...
The following weren't banking mistakes but were contributory:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.