Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Zed

Sympathetic jury wanting to do “something” for the victims’ families...and lawyers going after the deepest pockets. This will be tossed, or greatly reduced, on appeal..


2 posted on 07/31/2014 5:55:39 AM PDT by ken5050 ("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three or more are a Congress".. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ken5050

All the money in the world won’t bring someone back to life and it is a tragedy but at one point you have to ask yourself would any amount of security have thwarted a feral attack in this day and age? Probably not. Security guards aren’t respected. They’re barely a detterent.


6 posted on 07/31/2014 6:04:06 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Maybe.

The argument for liability is probably based on the common “chain of causation” argument.

Same reason a negligent driver can be held liable for the death of a person after an accident — even though it may have resulted form medical malpractice.

Also, unfortunately, $27 million isn’t that big of an award these days.


44 posted on 07/31/2014 8:29:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson