Posted on 08/03/2014 10:43:33 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Thanks.
I guess I should point out that the article references the Clintons “raising” perhaps $2B to $3B over two decades. This is not, or at least is not supposed to be, personal wealth.
Most of it has probably been spent by now on various political campaigns. Part of the way pols maintain influence is by raising and giving money to each other.
I strongly disagree.
Money is fungible---spending money on oneself in this manner means you don't have to touch your holdings.
So the money raised and spent on campaigns IS unquestionably personal wealth.
And in accumulating their loot, Bill and Hillary also ended up committing treason, for which they need to be indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced appropriately for traitors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.