Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/05/2014 6:10:16 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: servo1969

in the Castro, they do. haha


2 posted on 08/05/2014 6:11:51 AM PDT by sappy (criminaldems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Maybe the honesty’s too much.


3 posted on 08/05/2014 6:14:12 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

What I take away from the video is that they don’t make actual contact. He’s defining a contact point as the point where they get close enough to repel each other.

It might be different if an atom were a simple solid piece of matter but it isn’t. If a hydrogen atom had a nucleus the size of a basketball, it would have an electron orbiting nearly a half mile away. If you have a neighboring atom, it doesn’t seem possible that their electron orbits can cross or there would be chaos and the atoms would destroy each other. (Electrons smashing into each other or into the nuclei of the neighboring atom)


7 posted on 08/05/2014 6:36:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Well, according to wave-particle duality, they must touch. In fact, since waves propagate to infinity, if particles behave as waves, then every elementary particle in the universe is touching every other elementary particle.


8 posted on 08/05/2014 6:40:22 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

13 posted on 08/05/2014 6:50:51 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Do we want them to touch?

I thought we never wanted to cross the beams.

Anyway, this week is about virology. I don’t have time for nuclear physics.


15 posted on 08/05/2014 6:55:05 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Prof. Moriarty, eh?


17 posted on 08/05/2014 7:18:08 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

How about forces “contact” as described by his definition, but masses do not, unless they fuse or some such.


20 posted on 08/05/2014 7:23:36 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

“Parts” of them “touch” in forming bonds. The real problem though is that particles are composed of other particles, so that given various energy levels, how many of them actually touch each other?


22 posted on 08/05/2014 7:43:07 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

“Touching” is a macroscopic notion that has little meaning in the sub-microscopic world. According to QM everything essentially “touches” everything else.


23 posted on 08/05/2014 8:00:32 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Saved for later...


33 posted on 08/05/2014 12:32:34 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson