To: Buckeye McFrog
The fact that a court thinks it can ban a mobile phone app as a practical matter is just hilarious!
Just to provide some context: The legal problem is not the app, but the contract everyone who offers his services on Uber has to sign. Oversimplified; German law says that if you want to work as a chauffeur, you have to register it as a business and have the necessary insurance. Uber's contracts ignore these requirements, as they let un(der)insured (as in the US, standard car insurance doesn't cover Uber activities), unregistered drivers work for them. If Uber didn't take 20% or so of the transportation fees, i.e. if they just provided a platform, things might be different, but they are the ones collecting the money.
7 posted on
09/06/2014 9:17:13 AM PDT by
wolf78
(Inflation is a form of taxation, too. Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender.)
To: wolf78
Referring to an Uber driver as a “chauffeur” is akin to referring to the grillman at McDonalds a “chef.”
8 posted on
11/18/2018 1:13:05 PM PST by
SamAdams76
( If you are offended by what I have to say here then you can blame your parents for raising a wuss)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson