A nationwide movement has begun against the United States Government and all government officials including those at the local level and the police officers employed by these agencies (Anonymous, 2012). Locally, numerous activists have combined their programs to work together towards the same agenda, which seems similarly in line with that of the national revolution movement
About the Oathkeepers he explains
A first responder and military organization supporter group- National (Police Information Source)- Unidentified Members, one known member within the Austin Police Department
He further explains that these and other groups are just itching to go V for Vendetta and have stockpiled weapons.
They're everywhere!
This asshat needs to be fired ASAP.
The first problem is linguistic.
1) “Activists” are used as a euphemism to disguise the activities of “agitators” and “radicals”. Properly speaking, a real “activist” *exclusively* uses their civil rights within the system to cause change peacefully.
2) “Agitators”, who invariably describe themselves as “activists”, are half-in and half-outside of the system. They often receive funding from hidden sources, and use inappropriate and even illegal means to advance their agenda, while evading responsibility for their actions. They try to subvert the system, and once the change they want has been achieved, they misuse the system to retain it.
3) “Radicals”, who often describe themselves as “activists”, work entirely outside of the system, even when they are in the system, and they wish to destroy the system, replacing it with a new system. Usually their ‘ends’ are tyrannical, and their ‘means’ to those ends violent. They are motivated by hate, greed, envy, racism, sexism, etc., and embrace philosophies that support their actions.
Aren't the protections afforded "common citizens" good enough to protect officers and their families. If not, why not?
Justin Berry is too stupid to be a police officer.
Let the doxxing and harassment begin!