Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby Dies Whose Parents Wanted to Stop Life Support Just Because He Was Disabled
LIFE NEWS ^ | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 09/25/2014 7:55:01 PM PDT by Morgana

A disabled baby has died after a major battle in France pitted the parents of a disabled prematurely-born baby against doctors — as the parents wanted doctors to stop life support for their son because he is severely disabled.

The baby boy, named Titouan was born on August 31, four months before he was slated to be born. The baby weighed two pounds at birth and suffered from an intracerebral haemorrhage. Doctors at University Hospital Center of Poitiers said he has brain damage and they were unable to determine the extent of it. The baby’s parents, Mélanie and Aurélien, said doctors had informed them that their son will be severely disabled and paralyzed on one side of his body.

TitouanDoctors were asking the parents to hold off on taking their son off life support so they can more thoroughly evaluate his medical condition.

Now, Titouan has passed away — dying late Friday.

Before he passed away, doctors said his parents should not rush to take him off life support.

“If we want to be able to fully understand the consequences [of the haemorrhage], we can’t rush this. We need a few weeks to evaluate his condition,” said Professor Fabrice Pierre, of the department of gynecology and obstetrics at Poitiers CHU, on French TV channel France Bleu. “Currently, we are not giving him intensive treatment; we are simply giving him life support to give us the time to do a proper evaluation.”

But Titouan’s parents wanted to take him off life support.

“We made this decision over a week ago,” said the baby’s mother, Mélanie, who was interviewed by France Info. “Who wants their son to live the life of a handicapped person? Maybe some families want this, but we don’t.”

The law appears to allow doctors to make the decision:

Currently, euthanasia is illegal in France, though the 2005 law says that doctors are allowed to end or refrain from using treatments or care that result in the artificial prolongation of life, as long as the family agrees with the doctor’s decision. This is often referred to as “passive euthanasia,” or withholding treatments necessary to the continuation of life.

Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

Importantly, the 2005 law also puts the decision in the hands of the doctors. Faced with the repeated demands of Titouan’s parents, CHU’s neonatal unit sought out the advice of an ethics panel. They have yet to make a decision.

The case is being referred to as one of child euthanasia by French media, but noted anti-euthanasia advocate Alex Schadenberg says it’s incorrect to refer to it as such.

“The case of a premature baby in France, where the parents are demanding that medical treatment be discontinued and while the doctors believe that the child needs more time, is not a case of euthanasia, as the media has reported, but rather a case of who has the right to decide to withdraw medical treatment,” he explains. “Labelling this case as euthanasia creates a false impression of what euthanasia is and is not. Euthanasia is to directly and intentionally cause the death of a person. It is usually done by lethal injection and it is a form of homicide.”

“If the doctors withdraw all treatment from Titouan, and if he dies, it would be a natural death, unless they lethally inject him or intentionally dehydrate him to death,” he concluded before the baby died.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: disabled; prolife

1 posted on 09/25/2014 7:55:01 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Tough case. If the child was completely sustained by heart lung machinery, I could understand. If it was simply assistance in breathing by intubation, I would say no. Regardless, I would have waited for the doctors to say there was no hope for him to be able to live without the assistance.
2 posted on 09/25/2014 8:02:23 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It doesn’t sound like the little fellow was going to be able to make it without machines. Not knowing more than what the article says hard to say.


3 posted on 09/25/2014 8:05:34 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What if basic life support is just nutrition and fluid? Isn’t it murder to deprive an infant of those things?


4 posted on 09/25/2014 8:59:08 PM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone
In the old days, the baby would have just died a natural death on his own. I believe that sometimes this way is best. Sometimes the heroics to save people that would have died before all the life saving techniques now used leaves them much worse off.
5 posted on 09/25/2014 9:06:58 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone

They don’t think it’s murder. They do it to old people all the time.


6 posted on 09/25/2014 9:16:58 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This is so sad.

Would they have stopped life support if they hadn’t been told he was going to be handicapped and possibly brain damaged? Something tells me they probably wouldn’t have. :-(


7 posted on 09/25/2014 9:39:37 PM PDT by incindiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: incindiary

They didn’t stop support. The baby died while still getting life support. The ethics committee hadn’t made a decision yet.

It sounds to me like the parents were trying to save their baby from suffering. They were right. There was no hope for this little one.


8 posted on 09/26/2014 6:16:45 AM PDT by Marie (When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
“Who wants their son to live the life of a handicapped person?"

I've known literally hundreds of handicapped people, and none of them expressed any desire to die.

9 posted on 09/26/2014 6:21:32 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie
"They didn’t stop support. The baby died while still getting life support. The ethics committee hadn’t made a decision yet."

Where did it say that in the article? It said the doctors urged the parents to not rush to take him off life support.... but the parents wanted to take him off life support.

It's possible that the article is wrong, but I'm just going by what it said. Here's an excerpt:

Before he passed away, doctors said his parents should not rush to take him off life support.

“If we want to be able to fully understand the consequences [of the haemorrhage], we can’t rush this. We need a few weeks to evaluate his condition,” said Professor Fabrice Pierre, of the department of gynecology and obstetrics at Poitiers CHU, on French TV channel France Bleu. “Currently, we are not giving him intensive treatment; we are simply giving him life support to give us the time to do a proper evaluation.”

But Titouan’s parents wanted to take him off life support.


Anyway, I think it's terrible. And yet another sign of the times.
10 posted on 09/26/2014 9:12:25 PM PDT by incindiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson