Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court takes up religious bias case over hijab
nbc 2 / ap ^ | 10-2-2014

Posted on 10/02/2014 7:07:43 AM PDT by Citizen Zed

The Supreme Court will consider whether retailer Abercrombie & Fitch's refusal to hire a woman wearing a Muslim headscarf was religious discrimination.

A lower court said the New Albany, Ohio-based company didn't discriminate against the job applicant because she didn't' say she needed a religious accommodation.

But the Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear the Obama administration's appeal.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had sued on behalf of Samantha Elauf. The agency contended that Elauf wasn't hired at a Tulsa, Oklahoma, store because her hijab violated Abercrombie's dress code.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbc-2.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Is this her? ...
1 posted on 10/02/2014 7:07:43 AM PDT by Citizen Zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Fat chicks have a better case.


2 posted on 10/02/2014 7:12:46 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (When Amnesty was granted 30 years ago, they promised to close the borders and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
Suppose the company said that true Islam forbids women from working? Therefore, out of concern for her safety, the safety of the other employees and customers, they showed respect for her religion by not hiring her.

There are, after all, documented cases of Islamic enforcers gunning down women working and girls being educated.

3 posted on 10/02/2014 7:15:29 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Hijabis doing lawfare!


4 posted on 10/02/2014 7:16:01 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
But the Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear the Obama administration's appeal.

The 0bola administration going to bat for muzzies against an American company?

Well color me surprised!

5 posted on 10/02/2014 7:22:05 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Can a Klan member wear their hood to work? Wearing the rag on their head states that they hate Jews. I think it’s kind of like wearing the Nazi Swastika and is totally offensive to Jews and Christians alike.


6 posted on 10/02/2014 7:24:31 AM PDT by Bluebeard16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Suppose the company said that true Islam forbids women from working? Therefore, out of concern for her safety, the safety of the other employees and customers, they showed respect for her religion by not hiring her.

The problem with that argument would be that the law requires employers to make reasonable accomodations for an employee's religious beliefs, rather than the employee's religion. So, if the employee does not believe that Islam forbids women from working, the employer can't impose that belief on the employee, in the name of respecting the employee's religion.

7 posted on 10/02/2014 7:27:59 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

“But who will protect the right of women and girls not to wear the hijab if they so choose?”

Georgia: Muslim stabs sister for refusing to wear hijab

“Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one’s religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state in our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That’s why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab and to punish those who would deny it.” — Barack Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009

But who will protect the right of women and girls not to wear the hijab if they so choose? Women and girls such as Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it; and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab; and the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; and the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, and all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab — who will stand for them?

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/10/georgia-muslim-stabs-sister-for-refusing-to-wear-hijab


8 posted on 10/02/2014 7:28:13 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

It is NOT a religion. It IS a form of government.

It should be outlawed in the US.


9 posted on 10/02/2014 7:57:10 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (NO MORE IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
It should be, but it is not. In fact, it is promoted, aided and abetted , covered up , and encouraged by the Government of the United States and its propaganda arm, the media. In particular, the Democrat Party. Why? I believe that it is because the muslims hate God, Jews, Christians, Christians, and women and the Democrats know this. the Democrat Party also rabidly hate these groups of people and will aid and abet the muslims in every way humanly possible to destroy these groups.

If what happened in OK last is not enough to wake the sheep up, nothing will.

10 posted on 10/02/2014 8:08:36 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson