Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

It looks to me like he is well outside the 3 foot range of droplets, and the patient does not seem to be actively vomiting in any case.


7 posted on 10/16/2014 7:20:20 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom
patient does not seem to be actively vomiting

Can't tell because of the hazmat suit, but that would really really suck with that hood on. As if having Ebola isn't bad enough.

11 posted on 10/16/2014 8:01:03 PM PDT by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
It looks to me like he is well outside the 3 foot range of droplets, and the patient does not seem to be actively vomiting in any case

LOL, he flew on the plane with the patient. That close enough? And since when do people put on hazmat suits only after a patient with a deadly transmittable disease that they are in close contact with starts "actively vomiting"? Where exactly did you get that standard? How close would you stand to an Ebola patient without a hazmat suit? How close would you let your children stand to an Ebola patient without a hazmat suit, even if they weren't "actively vomiting"? Would you tell them, "hey kids, remember no closer than three feet or you die a horrible bloody death"?

In short, what exactly are you defending here?

12 posted on 10/16/2014 8:14:40 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson