This was not a "NASA Rocket." This is Orbital Sciences operating under a NASA contract. This is the "cheap, reliable, commercial alternative" to NASA-led programs that FReepers always hail as superior.
I guess nobody's perfect.
“This was not a “NASA Rocket.” This is Orbital Sciences operating under a NASA contract.
That’s right. Nasa only creates powerpoint presentations anymore.
This actually utilizes Russian engines, which will no doubt get the blame.
“This is the “cheap, reliable, commercial alternative” to NASA-led programs”
ROckets blow up sometimes. It’s a fact of life. I fail to see the advantage of how blowing up an expensive NASA diversity rocket would be better than blowing up a cheaper one.