You do not have an 84% death rate with 6,000 dead and 17,000 having been infected unless you have a huge jump in the infected this week which is not the case.
News reporting since a week before the elections has been clamped down on in a huge way. If governments are controlling the news then what is the real death number now because this 6,000 number is laughable to anybody with even the slightest bit of logical thinking?
Then lets take this to the next logical step. If the death rate is hugely bogus why would we believe the infected rate?
“You do not have an 84% death rate with 6,000 dead and 17,000 having been infected unless you have a huge jump in the infected this week which is not the case.
News reporting since a week before the elections has been clamped down on in a huge way.”
Oh yeah. I projected 24,000 open cases for Dec 1. There was 16K reported. Unless they are quietly field testing new drugs, they are effective, and they are not talking about it, then the numbers are likely off.
There are also people dropping dead in the US with symptoms of Ebola, only to have someone say they didn’t die of Ebola. What they DID die of was never mentioned, but it wasn’t ebola.
Ever since Ron Klain stepped into the job, the lock down and obfuscation of the news in the US is evident. I would imagine that’s what he was hired to do.
Now he’s stepped down. We’ll see what happens.
Another thing - not a PEEP about, or from, the army unit down there in West Africa to deal with this thing. Nothing.
It’s weird.