“The recurrent nightmare for us is ... ‘What do we do’”?
Liberty?
Liberty?
What’s that?
“Liberty?”
There was a very good opinion piece a while back, based on the Gruber comments I think, saying that while Americans support universal coverage in principle that approval craters once told that they not only have to pay out for their own coverage but that of others as well.
In the Obamacare debate there was no discussion of there being no free lunch on healthcare. Attempts to have that discussion were drowned out by the lies over reduction of costs ($2500 per household, right?) and that you could keep your plan and your doctor.
So, should the Supremes overturn the subsidies we’d FINALLY get that debate. With accurate statistics about the actual costs involved. And it would most likely happen at the proper level of government (the states).