Posted on 03/06/2015 7:31:13 PM PST by PROCON
Isn’t gravity relative?
“Accident insurance”.
Heretics are burned at the stake, right Biteme?
Joe’s just another demonrat lightbender; i.e. so dense that light bends around him.
so said the only Senator to vote against the original Alaskan Pipeline. Wrong-way Joe. It’s not just a nick-name. It’s a way of life
Joe being an expert in mindlessness, this is series.
Talk about “close to mindless”.....Biden has $hit for brains.
Anyone heard of the Electric Universe theory? I just found out about it recently and it blew my mind. Still got tonnes of youtube lectures to watch. It debunks the main stream big bang/inflation/dark matter/dark energy theories. The scientist that believe in the big bang exhibit the same human flaws that global warming scientist exhibit. Arrogance and their belief their mathematical models are superior to reality
Is Vice still owned by MTV?
Biden’s thought processes are muddled due to multiple trans ischemic attacks. End of story.
Furtheremore, scientists are encouraged to challenge those "established" laws of physics. In other words, there is no such thing as "settled science".
Galileo's view of gravity had to be corrected by Newton. And Newton's view of gravity had to be corrected by Einstein. And Einstein's view probably won't be the last word.
All "settled science" is junk science.
Yeah, you’re right ... there is not “settled science”. I understand that the speed of light is not absolute and may be declining ... which would throw a lot of other things into question.
Joe, since you are an expert on this subject, please tell us how members of a convention of 600 "climate change deniers" would respond when asked the following questions:
1. Does climate change?Sorry, Joe, but you're wrong as usual. None of the "deniers" at that convention agreed that ANY of those six questions should be answered in the negative.
2. Has the atmospheric concentration of CO2 increased since the late 1950s?
3. Is Man likely to have contributed to the measured increase in CO2 concentration since the late 1950s?
4. Other things being equal, is it likely that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will cause some global warming?
5. Is it likely that there has been some global warming since the late 1950s?
6. Is it likely that Man’s emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases have contributed to the measured global warming since 1950?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/11/the-climate-consensus-is-not-97-its-100/
Find yourself another straw man.
Funny how the climate change folks are global warming deniers, in that they had to change the name
Hey Biden, it’s the “Man Made” horsecrap that doesn’t have gravity.
Snake Oil Salesman.....
Lunchbucket Joe, proudly showing off his idiocy yet again.
If the Guiness Book of World Records has a “Biggest Logical Fallacy” category, someone should enter Joe’s gem here under: “Begging the Question, American Liberal, 21st Century”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.