E. Pluribus Unum
Since Nov 22, 1998

view home page, enter name:


Federal Statistics of black on white violence, with links and mathematical extrapolation formulas
Before ObamaCare there were over 1,100 insurance companies in the health market. Now there are 30, plus there are now 463 counties in the US that have only one health insurance underwriter.

Furthermore, each of those 1,100+ defunct insurance companies had sufficient IT systems, sales and back-office support staff and were all paying claims on a timely basis, backed up by a state regulator who was happy to enforce the letter of the law.

ObamaCare caused the trashing and total waste of all of these system and facilities and has spent billions in a futile attempt to replicate their functions, all in the name of insuring the uninsured.

There are now more uninsured than ever, thanks to Obamacare.



“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Bibliography:

GunFacts.info, Inconvenient DOJ gun-crime statistics

WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)

OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275) (PDF of article)

Harvard Study Shows No Effect of Firearm Laws on Gun Deaths



Click image to download poster in PDF format

Click image to download poster in PDF format

Global temperatures have been declining for 2000 years when you don’t use Michael Mann's documented fraudulent "hockey stick" data used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The Tree Ring Data Scandal
http://cfact.eu/2009/10/03/the-false-tree-ring-data-scandal/

New tree ring study shows 2000 years of cooling
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/09/this-is-what-global-cooling-really-looks-like/

Extreme weather is an integral part of the Earth’s climate.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/10/extreme-weather-is-an-integral-part-of-the-earths-climate/ (IPCC).


Global temperatures have been declining for 2000 years when you don’t use Michael Mann's documented fraudulent "hockey stick" data used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The Tree Ring Data Scandal
http://cfact.eu/2009/10/03/the-false-tree-ring-data-scandal/

New tree ring study shows 2000 years of cooling
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/09/this-is-what-global-cooling-really-looks-like/

Extreme weather is an integral part of the Earth’s climate.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/10/extreme-weather-is-an-integral-part-of-the-earths-climate/


The Ten Planks of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto
(and How Statists Implement Them)

  1. Abolition of private property rights (via high property taxes, restrictive zoning laws, "fair housing" edicts, environmental and "wetlands" regulations, UN Agenda 21, etc.)

  2. Institution of a heavily graduated income tax (by calling it "taxing the rich")

  3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance (through a confiscatory estate tax on "the rich")

  4. Confiscation of the property of enemies of the state (through lawless application of asset forfeiture and eminent domain)

  5. Centralization of credit into the hands of the state (Federal Reserve, Federal Trade Commission, TARP, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, federal takeover of student loans, etc.)

  6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation into the hands of the state (FCC, DOT, FEMA, NTSB, FAA, etc.).

  7. Consolidation and subjugation of all major industries to central government control (FDA, EPA, OSHA, ICC, HUD, NLRB, EEOC, DOE, TSA etc.)

  8. Mandatory labor union membership ("card check" to bypass employee consent, automatic withholding of union dues, forced unionization of health care workers, teachers, police, firefighters, etc.)

  9. Equitable redistribution of all wealth (TANF, SSI, EITC, SNAP, Community Reinvestment Act, etc.)

  10. Free public education (and food, housing, health care, cell phones, Internet access, etc.)


Not that facts enter into the gun control debate now that the Left-wing extremists see an opportunity to end America as we knew it, but here are two journal articles that illustrate the unintended consequences of gun control, namely increased murder and suicide rates, and mass-murder by government of its own citizens.

WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275)

http://lawreview.wustl.edu/inprint/75-3/753-4.html
http://digitalcommons.law.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1582&context=lawreview


Not that facts enter into the gun control debate now that the Left-wing extremists see an opportunity to end America as we knew it, but here are two journal articles that illustrate the unintended consequences of gun control, namely increased murder and suicide rates, and mass-murder by government of its own citizens.

WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)

OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275) (PDF Version)


INCONVENIENT FACT: According to the peer-reviewed Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, countries with strict gun control laws have higher murder and suicide rates than those without.

DOCUMENTATION: Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence by Don B. Kates and Gary Mauser, Volume 30, Number 2 of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, pages 649-694. (To download a PDF copy of the journal article, simply Google the title. It is available on the web free of charge.)

QUOTE FROM ARTICLE: “If you are surprised by our findings, so are we. We did not begin this research with any intent to “exonerate” handguns, but there it is — a negative finding, to be sure, but a negative finding is nevertheless a positive contribution. It directs us where not to aim public health resources.”

INDIRECTION: The trick hoplophobes always use is to say that America has higher gun-murder rates than other countries, but many of those “murders” are criminals killed in the act of committing violent crimes or criminal gang members killing each other. Compare absolute murder rates, and the result is “more guns, less murder.” (Source: GunFacts.info)

SECOND INCONVENIENT FACT: According to DOJ crime statistics, guns are used by US citizens 2.5 million times per year to prevent violent crimes like rape, robbery, home-invasion and carjacking, 99% of the time without a shot being fired. (Source: GunFacts.info)

THIRD INCONVENIENT FACT: Rifles are used in less than 1% of gun crimes. “Assault weapons” (AKA semiautomatic rifles) are used in a small fraction of that 1%. (Source: GunFacts.info)

QUESTION: If gun-free zones make people safe, then why don’t we declare the immediate vicinity of the President and Vice-President to be gun-free zones and send the Secret Service home? Or are gun-free zones good enough for our kids, but not good enough for our overlords? It is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy for politicians to surround themselves with armed guards while dictating that our children be soft targets.

METAPHOR: America has more private gun ownership than most other countries, so naturally there are more gun murders. America also has more hospitals than most other countries, so naturally we have more people dying in hospitals. Does that mean we should outlaw hospitals?

FINAL INCONVENIENT FACT: Since 1900, governments have murdered 262 million of their own citizens, and gun control was always the first step.

FINAL DOCUMENTATION:

20th Century Democide (Google title for link)

Of Holocausts and Gun Control, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275) (To download a PDF copy of the journal article, simply Google the title. It is available on the web free of charge.)


Another deliberately deceptive use of indirection by the gun-grabbers.

According to DOJ crime statitistics, guns are used by private citizens 2.5 million times per year to prevent violent crimes like rape, robbery, carjacking and home-invasion, 99% of the time without a shot being fired. (Source: GunFacts.info)

Fact is, most criminals are cowards who only pick on victims they believe to be defenseless. As soon as most criminals discover that an intended victim is not defenseless, they run like scalded dogs.

Case closed.


We need to use Rules for Radicals AGAINST Community Agitator Ubama. God knows he's used them against us.

This petition implements RULE #5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."

If gun-free zones make people safe, then why don’t we declare the immediate vicinity of the President and Vice-President to be gun-free zones and send the Secret Service home? Or are gun-free zones good enough for our kids, but not good enough for our overlords? It is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy for politicians to surround themselves with armed guards while dictating that our children be soft targets.

There are 8 more days to get the required number of signatures on the petition

The petition illustrates the absurdity of gun-free zones.

Rush always talks about of illustrating absurdity by being absurd, and that's all this is.

The Alinskyites are killing us with Rules for Radicals #12, right now:

RULE #12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

How do we fight back?

By being nice?

"Holding ourselves to a higher standard" is just the flip side of Rule 4:

RULE #4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.


I'll give up my guns when all politicians and elected officials give up their armed guards.

Deal?

Guns are either good or bad. You can't have it both ways.



Frightened?

Of course we are.

  1. Governments have murdered 262 million of their own citizens in the past 113 years
  2. Gun control was always the first step
  3. The overwhelming majority of those murders were perpetrated by Socialist/Communist/Marxist governments
  4. Comrade Ubama is a rigid Marxist ideologue
Any questions?
According to DOJ crime statistics, guns are used 2.5 million times per year by ordinary citizens to prevent violent crimes like rape, robbery, carjacking and home-invasion, 99% of the time without a shot being fired.

http://gunfacts.info

Not that facts enter into the gun control debate now that the Left-wing extremists see an opportunity to end America as we knew it, but here are two journal articles that illustrate the unintended consequences of gun control, namely increased murder and suicide rates, and mass-murder by government of its own citizens.

WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275)

http://lawreview.wustl.edu/inprint/75-3/753-4.html


Everybody is against violence, Sweetie, but countries with strict gun control laws have higher overall rates of violence than those that don't.

WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

The trick you hoplophobes use is to insist on focusing on gun violence alone, as if it exists in a vacuum.

Don't you care about the people who get killed by fists and feet and knives and baseball bats too?

Or is your concern limited strictly to guns and how to subjugate the people who own them?



"I am The Won that I have been waiting for."



The fish is rotting from the head down.





SAUL ALINSKY'S RULES FOR RADICALS


Wolverines!







MUSLIM POPULATION TIMELINE

  1. As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.
  2. At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

  3. From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

  4. When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.

  5. After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.

  6. At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.

  7. From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.

  8. After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in Bangladesh — Muslim 83%, Egypt — Muslim 90%, Gaza — Muslim 98.7%, Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%, Iran — Muslim 98%, Iraq — Muslim 97%, Jordan — Muslim 92%

  9. 100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in: Afghanistan — Muslim 100%, Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%, Somalia — Muslim 100%, Yemen ---Muslim 100%.





 

CAUSE AND EFFECT

Someone Else Once Said Your Children Belong To The Community

Whenever a progressive refers to “investments,” he or she is referring to confiscation of private wealth.

Whenever a progressive invokes the “community,” that term refers to a state-engineered collective in which the individual has no rights.

Whenever a collectivist refers to “public education,” that phrase is shorthand for the process of destroying a child’s developing sense of self-ownership and indoctrinating them in the notion that they are the property of the “community.” This process is also known as “socialization,” which is the indefinable value-added element that supposedly makes “public education” superior to homeschooling.





You don't have to shoot somebody to have your life saved by having a gun.

According to DOJ crime statistics, guns are used by US citizens 2.5 million times per year to prevent violent crimes like rape, robbery, home-invasion and carjacking, 99% of the time without a shot being fired. (Source: GunFacts.info)

In other words, guns are used 99 times to drive away a perpetrator for each time a gun is used to shoot one.

Take away guns, and those 99 people who defended themselves without a shot being fired become victims instead.


Can you spot the haters? WARNING: Photo contains topless haters

Wayback Machine





The physical sciences are incredible at defining the physical world, but they never touch consciousness, with the exception of quantum mechanics, which requires a conscious observer for certain phenomena to occur.

God is a conscious being. You aren't going to find Him in the physical sciences.






Even Turkey's Prime Minister looks embarrassed by the LGBT-in-Chief

THE BUMBERSHOOT INCIDENT


 photo download_zpsa4d02279.gif








Progressives/Communists have to pretend that so many lies are the truth in order to enslave the non-Progressive/non-Communists that they hate so much.

They have to pretend that bringing a 2" plastic picnic knife to school to cut an apple is the same thing as bringing a 6" switchblade to school to stab a rival gang member.

The have to pretend that cutting a pop-tart into the imagined shape of a gun in the school cafeteria is the same thing as bringing an AK-47 onto school grounds.

They have to pretend that a person who has owned guns since the age of twelve for hunting and personal protection and never used one to harm another human being in their entire life is the same thing as a gang-banger owning guns who only uses them for drive-by shootings, robberies and carjackings or a crazy person shooting up a school or shopping mall.

They have to pretend that a law-abiding citizen who purchases firearm ammunition every year for target practice and hunting is the same thing as a hardened convict who only needs one box of ammo in his entire criminal career.

They have to pretend that requiring a background check for purchasing guns is "common sense," but that requiring a photo ID for voter registration is racist "voter suppression."

They have to pretend that a hundred and fifty million gun owners should be condemned for the actions of a handful of crazies who shoot up schools and shopping malls, but that Moslems should not be condemned for a handful of crazies who hijack airplanes and crash them into buildings, or strap on homicide vests and blow up innocent people.

But we're the ones who are the "gun nuts."




If Zimmerman wailed, he must not be jailed.

Does 911 tape prove George Zimmerman acted in self-defense?










The US feral government has shoved abortion-on-demand, mandatory contraception and over-the-counter morning-after pills down our throats, then they tell us that we must surrender our sovereignty to foreign invaders disguised as "immigrants" because we don't have enough babies.

See how that works?






The elephant in the room is that Rachel Jeantel is the reason Trayvon Martin is dead.

She was on the phone talking trash to him about the "creepy-#%% cracker rapist" following him and how if he was a real gangster he'd give the cracker a beat-down he'd never forget.

She even said that Trayvon was just going to give Zimmerman an #%%-whooping and George overreacted.

White-Hispanics are just supposed to let Eric Holder's people whoop their #%%es, don't you see?

It is racist to resist.





Here is what the Trayvon Martin hoax is all about: Eric Holder and his people consider violent crime against Whitey to be a legitimate career path, and armed Whiteys to be an OSHA violation.

They have to drum up some way to take the guns away from Whitey.




Who could have guessed that one day pro wrestling would be less fake than mainstream journalism?


The Saint Skittles marches make sense when considered in context with our corrupt election laws.

By making it illegal to check voter registrations we have encouraged black people to believe that they have a civil right to steal elections.

The logical progression from there would be to believe that they have a civil right to dictate judicial outcomes.



Raising Hell in Subsidized Housing

As Program Moves Poor to Suburbs, Tensions Follow

American Murder Mystery

The Unspeakable Blackness of Section 8 and Crime


The first slaves sold in America were white. 1618. Does anyone know that? Of the 10 million or so Africans sold as slaves in the New World, over 4 million were sold in Brazil. Only 450,000 or so were sold in America (according to Henry Louis Gates, Jr.) Does anyone know that? Most of the white slaves were Irish men, women, and children or orphans taken from the streets of London. The exact number of white slaves sold is difficult to determine since the English kept the information suppressed. In the1690s, 100,000 Irish boys and girls between the ages of 14 and 16 were sold in the West Indies, but the exact number sold in the US isn't known. Some place the number between 1 and 2 million.

What is known is that the first slave owner in America was a black man with an indentured servant; he went to court to be able to keep him permanently. What is known is that the largest slave owner in South Carolina in 1860 was a black man, William Ellison, who was a freed slave himself. What is known is that 28% of slave owners in New Orleans were black, according to the 1860 census. What is known is that the free blacks fought for the Confederacy were fighting against abolitionism.

What is known is that reparations have already been paid, were paid 150 years ago in the blood of northern white boys that soaked into the soil of fields all across the South.

It's enough already. No one in this country owes anyone else anything. It's time for everyone to put their big boy and big girl panties on and get over themselves .



>




RACISM EXPLAINED

A black kid asks his mother, "Mama, what's capitalism?"

"Well, son, that's when white folks work every day so we can get all our benefits, you knows, like free cell phones for each family member, rent subsidy, food stamps, WIC, free healthcare, utility subsidy, & the list goes on & on, you knows".

"But Mama, don't the white people get pissed off about that?"

"Sure they do, that's called racism!"



Blacks are less than 13% of the population but commit 49% of the murders. The overwhelming majority of those murders are committed by young black males, who represent a little over 3% of the population.

Remove illegal alien and black crime from US crime statistics, and the US is as peaceful as Sweden.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/07/murder_most_swedish.html








Let's call this what it really is: Qatar wants to build a natural gas pipeline across Syria to Europe. Russia has had a death grip on Europe for years by supplying it with, and threatening periodically to cut off, natural gas through their own pipeline. Russia does NOT want the Qatarian pipeline built. Assad was Russia's lackey in this instance, keeping the pipeline from being built. Unseating Assad opens up the Syrian pipeline route. Europe wants the new source of natural gas, so they, of course, are willing to go along with a military strike against Assad, so long as the U.S. spends its money and blood in the process. So what does the US get out of this? Continued support of the Saudi and Qatar sheiks for keeping oil and gas trading in terms of Dollars and not gold or some other currency. For if the world began to move away from Dollars as its reserve currency, our profligate spending must come to a halt. Either that or inflation begins to reflect the amount of debt we've been running up and the amount of Dollars the Fed has printed to cover the spending beyond our means, a situation that would spell the end for our current class of ruling elites.

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956










The people who complain about "wealth inequality" have no clue that "wealth" is income that you don't spend.

People who spend every cent they can get their hands on will never have "wealth," no matter how much "redistributing" you do.

And "wealth" is not the same thing as disposable income for entertainment and toys. "Wealth" is investment.

The perfect example is NBA players who have all kinds of disposable income for hoes and bling while they are playing, and nothing five years after they retire.

You can't fix stupid, no matter how much of the non-stupids' money you steal and redistribute.



Statistically, how much we spend on government schools has nothing to do with educational outcome.

http://blogs.rgj.com/factcheck...

The number one determinant of educational outcome is whether there are two heterosexual parents in the home.

http://worldfamilymap.org/2013...







Before ObamaCare, there were more than 1,100 insurance companies, each with a sufficiently functioning IT system, each with a sufficiently functioning support staff, each with a sufficiently functioning billing system, and each with a state regulator who worked to make sure every system and corporate function was indeed functioning and paying claims in full.

Today, there are 30 insurance companies in the health market. ObamaCare has failed in these several years (more time than required to fight WWII) to build replacement IT and support systems, and in the process trashed the capital investment of over 1,000 insurance companies while wasting billions of dollars on IT and related support.

Today, there are 463 counties in the US with on a single insurance carrier selling policies.

This is a GROTESQUE waste and destruction of liberty. Even if it is repealed, how many of the 1,000+ insurance companies will return to selling health insurance? I bet fewer than half. This CLUSTER-FAIL has destroyed more US assets than 10 Katrinas ever could.









Common Core supporters will tell you that our education system is falling behind the rest of the world. What they won't tell you is that the lowest achievers (you know who they are) are dragging down the aggregate scores. The unionized education bureaucracy (AKA teachers) are collectivists. They don't look upon students as individuals. They look upon them as herds of cattle.

Fact is, a Japanese kid in an American school does better than a Japanese kid in a school in Japan. Same thing for any ethnic group you can name, except for a particular ethnic group that cannot be named.

Since that ethnic group has an average IQ of 85, it is impossible to raise their scores. In the name of "equality" however, it is possible to cripple the high-achievers and drag their scores down.

It's not fair that some people are more successful than others, you see.

If Common Core is so great, why did all the developers have to sign non-disclosure agreements?

Does a non-disclosure agreement have any place at all in public education?

Watch this video on Common Core titled "Building the Machine" for documentation

http://www.commoncoremovie.com/