|
E. Pluribus Unum
Since Nov 22, 1998
| |||||
|
| ||||||
GunFacts.info, Inconvenient DOJ gun-crime statistics
WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)
OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275) (PDF of article)
Harvard Study Shows No Effect of Firearm Laws on Gun Deaths


Global temperatures have been declining for 2000 years when you dont use Michael Mann's documented fraudulent "hockey stick" data used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The Tree Ring Data Scandal
http://cfact.eu/2009/10/03/the-false-tree-ring-data-scandal/
New tree ring study shows 2000 years of cooling
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/09/this-is-what-global-cooling-really-looks-like/
Extreme weather is an integral part of the Earths climate.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/10/extreme-weather-is-an-integral-part-of-the-earths-climate/ (IPCC).
Global temperatures have been declining for 2000 years when you dont use Michael Mann's documented fraudulent "hockey stick" data used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The Tree Ring Data Scandal
http://cfact.eu/2009/10/03/the-false-tree-ring-data-scandal/
New tree ring study shows 2000 years of cooling
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/09/this-is-what-global-cooling-really-looks-like/
Extreme weather is an integral part of the Earths climate.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/10/extreme-weather-is-an-integral-part-of-the-earths-climate/
|
WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275)
http://lawreview.wustl.edu/inprint/75-3/753-4.html
http://digitalcommons.law.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1582&context=lawreview
WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)
OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275) (PDF Version)
INCONVENIENT FACT: According to the peer-reviewed Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, countries with strict gun control laws have higher murder and suicide rates than those without.
DOCUMENTATION: Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence by Don B. Kates and Gary Mauser, Volume 30, Number 2 of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, pages 649-694. (To download a PDF copy of the journal article, simply Google the title. It is available on the web free of charge.)
QUOTE FROM ARTICLE: If you are surprised by our findings, so are we. We did not begin this research with any intent to exonerate handguns, but there it is a negative finding, to be sure, but a negative finding is nevertheless a positive contribution. It directs us where not to aim public health resources.
INDIRECTION: The trick hoplophobes always use is to say that America has higher gun-murder rates than other countries, but many of those murders are criminals killed in the act of committing violent crimes or criminal gang members killing each other. Compare absolute murder rates, and the result is more guns, less murder. (Source: GunFacts.info)
SECOND INCONVENIENT FACT: According to DOJ crime statistics, guns are used by US citizens 2.5 million times per year to prevent violent crimes like rape, robbery, home-invasion and carjacking, 99% of the time without a shot being fired. (Source: GunFacts.info)
THIRD INCONVENIENT FACT: Rifles are used in less than 1% of gun crimes. Assault weapons (AKA semiautomatic rifles) are used in a small fraction of that 1%. (Source: GunFacts.info)
QUESTION: If gun-free zones make people safe, then why dont we declare the immediate vicinity of the President and Vice-President to be gun-free zones and send the Secret Service home? Or are gun-free zones good enough for our kids, but not good enough for our overlords? It is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy for politicians to surround themselves with armed guards while dictating that our children be soft targets.
METAPHOR: America has more private gun ownership than most other countries, so naturally there are more gun murders. America also has more hospitals than most other countries, so naturally we have more people dying in hospitals. Does that mean we should outlaw hospitals?
FINAL INCONVENIENT FACT: Since 1900, governments have murdered 262 million of their own citizens, and gun control was always the first step.
FINAL DOCUMENTATION:
20th Century Democide (Google title for link)
Of Holocausts and Gun Control, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275) (To download a PDF copy of the journal article, simply Google the title. It is available on the web free of charge.)
According to DOJ crime statitistics, guns are used by private citizens 2.5 million times per year to prevent violent crimes like rape, robbery, carjacking and home-invasion, 99% of the time without a shot being fired. (Source: GunFacts.info)
Fact is, most criminals are cowards who only pick on victims they believe to be defenseless. As soon as most criminals discover that an intended victim is not defenseless, they run like scalded dogs.
Case closed.
We need to use Rules for Radicals AGAINST Community Agitator Ubama. God knows he's used them against us.
This petition implements RULE #5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."
If gun-free zones make people safe, then why dont we declare the immediate vicinity of the President and Vice-President to be gun-free zones and send the Secret Service home? Or are gun-free zones good enough for our kids, but not good enough for our overlords? It is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy for politicians to surround themselves with armed guards while dictating that our children be soft targets.
There are 8 more days to get the required number of signatures on the petition
The petition illustrates the absurdity of gun-free zones.
Rush always talks about of illustrating absurdity by being absurd, and that's all this is.
The Alinskyites are killing us with Rules for Radicals #12, right now:
RULE #12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
How do we fight back?
By being nice?
"Holding ourselves to a higher standard" is just the flip side of Rule 4:
RULE #4: Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
Deal?
Guns are either good or bad. You can't have it both ways.

Of course we are.
http://gunfacts.info
Not that facts enter into the gun control debate now that the Left-wing extremists see an opportunity to end America as we knew it, but here are two journal articles that illustrate the unintended consequences of gun control, namely increased murder and suicide rates, and mass-murder by government of its own citizens.
WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL, Washington University Law Quarterly, Volume 75, Number 3, Fall 1997 (pp. 1237-1275)
http://lawreview.wustl.edu/inprint/75-3/753-4.html
WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 2007 (pp. 649-694)
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
The trick you hoplophobes use is to insist on focusing on gun violence alone, as if it exists in a vacuum.
Don't you care about the people who get killed by fists and feet and knives and baseball bats too?
Or is your concern limited strictly to guns and how to subjugate the people who own them?














At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in Bangladesh Muslim 83%, Egypt Muslim 90%, Gaza Muslim 98.7%, Indonesia Muslim 86.1%, Iran Muslim 98%, Iraq Muslim 97%, Jordan Muslim 92%
100% will usher in the peace of Dar-es-Salaam the Islamic House of Peace. Here theres supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in: Afghanistan Muslim 100%, Saudi Arabia Muslim 100%, Somalia Muslim 100%, Yemen ---Muslim 100%.




![]() |
|
|
|
|
Whenever a progressive refers to investments, he or she is referring to confiscation of private wealth.
Whenever a progressive invokes the community, that term refers to a state-engineered collective in which the individual has no rights.
Whenever a collectivist refers to public education, that phrase is shorthand for the process of destroying a childs developing sense of self-ownership and indoctrinating them in the notion that they are the property of the community. This process is also known as socialization, which is the indefinable value-added element that supposedly makes public education superior to homeschooling.



According to DOJ crime statistics, guns are used by US citizens 2.5 million times per year to prevent violent crimes like rape, robbery, home-invasion and carjacking, 99% of the time without a shot being fired. (Source: GunFacts.info)
In other words, guns are used 99 times to drive away a perpetrator for each time a gun is used to shoot one.
Take away guns, and those 99 people who defended themselves without a shot being fired become victims instead.



God is a conscious being. You aren't going to find Him in the physical sciences.













They have to pretend that bringing a 2" plastic picnic knife to school to cut an apple is the same thing as bringing a 6" switchblade to school to stab a rival gang member.
The have to pretend that cutting a pop-tart into the imagined shape of a gun in the school cafeteria is the same thing as bringing an AK-47 onto school grounds.
They have to pretend that a person who has owned guns since the age of twelve for hunting and personal protection and never used one to harm another human being in their entire life is the same thing as a gang-banger owning guns who only uses them for drive-by shootings, robberies and carjackings or a crazy person shooting up a school or shopping mall.
They have to pretend that a law-abiding citizen who purchases firearm ammunition every year for target practice and hunting is the same thing as a hardened convict who only needs one box of ammo in his entire criminal career.
They have to pretend that requiring a background check for purchasing guns is "common sense," but that requiring a photo ID for voter registration is racist "voter suppression."
They have to pretend that a hundred and fifty million gun owners should be condemned for the actions of a handful of crazies who shoot up schools and shopping malls, but that Moslems should not be condemned for a handful of crazies who hijack airplanes and crash them into buildings, or strap on homicide vests and blow up innocent people.
But we're the ones who are the "gun nuts."


Does 911 tape prove George Zimmerman acted in self-defense?








See how that works?




She was on the phone talking trash to him about the "creepy-#%% cracker rapist" following him and how if he was a real gangster he'd give the cracker a beat-down he'd never forget.
She even said that Trayvon was just going to give Zimmerman an #%%-whooping and George overreacted.
White-Hispanics are just supposed to let Eric Holder's people whoop their #%%es, don't you see?
It is racist to resist.



They have to drum up some way to take the guns away from Whitey.




By making it illegal to check voter registrations we have encouraged black people to believe that they have a civil right to steal elections.
The logical progression from there would be to believe that they have a civil right to dictate judicial outcomes.

As Program Moves Poor to Suburbs, Tensions Follow
The Unspeakable Blackness of Section 8 and Crime
What is known is that the first slave owner in America was a black man with an indentured servant; he went to court to be able to keep him permanently. What is known is that the largest slave owner in South Carolina in 1860 was a black man, William Ellison, who was a freed slave himself. What is known is that 28% of slave owners in New Orleans were black, according to the 1860 census. What is known is that the free blacks fought for the Confederacy were fighting against abolitionism.
What is known is that reparations have already been paid, were paid 150 years ago in the blood of northern white boys that soaked into the soil of fields all across the South.
It's enough already. No one in this country owes anyone else anything. It's time for everyone to put their big boy and big girl panties on and get over themselves .

> 



| RACISM EXPLAINED A black kid asks his mother, "Mama, what's capitalism?" "Well, son, that's when white folks work every day so we can get all our benefits, you knows, like free cell phones for each family member, rent subsidy, food stamps, WIC, free healthcare, utility subsidy, & the list goes on & on, you knows". "But Mama, don't the white people get pissed off about that?" "Sure they do, that's called racism!" |

Remove illegal alien and black crime from US crime statistics, and the US is as peaceful as Sweden.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/07/murder_most_swedish.html







