Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/22/2015 4:02:04 PM PDT by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NRx

Both had rather leaky hulls.


2 posted on 03/22/2015 4:43:25 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
Well Mauritania looks pretty familiar too (Memento mori 7 May 1915)

And fastest ship on the Atlantic for 20 years, and name-checked by Rudyard Kipling

5 posted on 03/22/2015 6:54:11 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Television: Teacher, Mother, Secret Lover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
Just a quibble, but the name of the ships weren't "The Titanic" and "The Olympic." They were simply "Titanic" and "Olympic."

However, I did notice that you got the "RMS" designation correct. Many people erroneously refer to them as "HMS," which designates a military vessel. "Titanic" was a Royal Mail Steamer (or Steamship): RMS.

6 posted on 03/22/2015 7:29:43 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

I went to a Titanic museum in Vegas a few years ago. Even the 3rd class passengers were dressed in dresses and suits and ties. Now today, anything goes on cruises...


7 posted on 03/22/2015 7:36:27 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

This one blows my mind: Titanic compared to a modern cruise liner

10 posted on 03/22/2015 8:39:01 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson