I cannot imagine what it would take to convince you because you already have 100% absence of any evidence of guilt.
I cannot imagine what it would take to convince you because you already have 100% absence of any evidence of guilt.
Following suspicious-acting black people around is now apparently a chargeable offense, if they try to kill you and you injure or kill them in self-defense. Obama's legacy is that he managed make this the default response of the judicial system without incurring much of a political cost.
Absence of guilt is not proof of innocence. That’s why the verdict is always voiced as, “Not guilty.” No one says ‘innocent’ in a legal setting. That’s what pundits and politicians say.
Zimmerman just strikes me as a guy with control issues, so I’m not 100% convinced he’s innocent. That’s all. It’s nothing to debate over. There was certainly no evidence to prove him guilty...not even close.